User talk:Rawrnessyo

Oh, hey. I saw your edits while out on vandalism patrol, and good work with getting the image for Duluth High School uploaded and formatted properly in the page. I took care of the attempt that went wrong.

So of course there's one problem. We're major #¤%&@es about image use rights. I rarely work with images, but gather it's because copyright law is a major #¤%&@ about image use rights and enormous lawsuits would be a problem for non-profit organizations. Do you know the copyright status of the image? If it's your own work, there's a simple note to add to the image's page, issue solved. If it's off the school's website, or something similar, we may have to shoot the author an e-mail and ask.

Answering on this page will be fine. Also feel free to bug people on the Media copyright questions page, that's what it's there for. --Kiz o r  07:55, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Duluthhigh.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Duluthhigh.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:12, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Told ya. :( This is probably fixable but will take some work. You haven't been around for a few days, so if this issue is only resolved after the image is deleted, I and most other people with frankly amazing admin powers will restore it if asked on our respective user talk pages. --Kiz o r  08:27, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Still multiple problems with this image 1) a picture of the school isn't a logo. (using logo fair use template) 2) It still doesn't have a templated license. 3) It would fail criteria #1 of the Non-free content policy - as a picture of a building it's easily replaceable by a non-free image. So, even if a correct license is supplied, it will be deleted as replaceable fair use.   Skier Dude  ( talk ) 00:21, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Duluthhigh.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Duluthhigh.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Zoo Fari Boo!  04:35, 31 October 2009 (UTC)