User talk:Raxraxrax

About 82ASK and Re5ult
In response to your inquiry at User:ArglebargleIV : First, you copied the same text into 82ask and 82ASK -- in that case, one should be a redirect to the other. However, there's wasn't anything in there that either wasn't already in the Re5ult article, or is puffery which seemed to be taken from press releases. Okay, I've taken a second look at things. The redirect is good, but it probably should go the other way I think, redirecting 82ask to 82ASK. The article needs to be rewritten -- information about the parent company should be handle by a reference to Re5ult instead of a copy. The Sarah McVittie article has been deleted once already, and although she is the CEO of the company, nothing has really changed since then, and she's really not notable enough WP:NN for an article, or even a redirect. Some of the text you've put in Any Question Answered is pushy. Basically, this is an encyclopedia, not a promotional website, so some of the text has to be 'toned down', as it were, in my opinion. -- ArglebargleIV 14:27, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Proposed for Deletion notices
I've added the "prod" template to the article Sarah McVittie, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Sarah McVittie. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ArglebargleIV 15:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I've added the "prod" template to the article Texperts, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Texperts. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ArglebargleIV 15:41, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:075351179DoSheepShrinkInTheRainBookCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:075351179DoSheepShrinkInTheRainBookCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Qst 19:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Good Oil
A tag has been placed on Good Oil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. triwbe (talk) 14:57, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Do Sheep Shrink in the Rain? listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Do Sheep Shrink in the Rain?. Since you had some involvement with the Do Sheep Shrink in the Rain? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:09, 16 February 2019 (UTC)