User talk:RayLucero123

I hadn’t heard anything in regard to my “Unblock” request. As I had stated earlier, in the event of a dispute, I plan to try to reach a consensus or to pursue dispute resolution rather than engaging in a edit war, which is not constructive or conducive to what is expected.

July 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jesus, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  05:56, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

I submitted multiple sources, you mean to tell that none of those were reliable, what do you base this on? If I cite a King James “Bible” verse, is that considered reliable in regard to Jesus and his teachings regarding Hell, will that be deleted as well? I feel that this is nothing more than censorship! RayLucero123 (talk) 23:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * we base that on these Wikipedia policies: WP:V and WP:RS. You need to read these. Then you need to persuade your fellow editors to your view. You do that by arguing your case on the article talk page - not by keep making the same edit to the article over and over again. DeCausa (talk) 23:55, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

I hadn’t heard anything in regard to my “Unblock” request. As I had stated earlier, in the event of a dispute, I plan to try to reach a consensus or to pursue dispute resolution rather than engaging in a edit war, which is not constructive or conducive to what is expected. RayLucero123 (talk) 05:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
Your recent editing history at Jesus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DeCausa (talk) 22:09, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. DeCausa (talk) 23:43, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Jesus. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:49, 23 July 2022 (UTC)


 * You've just edited the article again per this which another editor has reverted per WP:PRIMARY. What you need to do is raise your point on the article talk page and hope to convince other editors of your point of view. WP:ONUS and WP:CONSENSUS explains. don't add your edit back until you've got agreement on the talk apge. DeCausa (talk) 22:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for edit warring, as you did at Jesus. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

How will you handle disputes going forward? 331dot (talk) 08:40, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * By following the policies, procedures and protocols that are in place.RayLucero123 (talk) 23:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Please describe what those "protocols" entail. Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:28, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
 * By Writing from a neutral point of view, that express views that are fair, proportionate and without bias. Also, by using reliable, published sources that have been verified and that contain no original research or thought.RayLucero123 (talk) 02:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
 * CONTENTDISPUTEs are inevitable on a project of this scope. What are the alternatives to EDITWARring? -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:10, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Handling Edit Disputes
I plan to engage in good faith to resolve any and all disputes, by not personalizing them. I understand that the objections of others must be taken into account. I also understand that Mediation can help in finding a compromise. I plan to approach any editors that I object with and state “why” I object with them while being civil as well as polite. RayLucero123 (talk) 17:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)