User talk:RayPointer

Little context in Finding Ko-Ko
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Finding Ko-Ko, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Finding Ko-Ko is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Finding Ko-Ko, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:00, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Finding Ko-Ko
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Finding Ko-Ko, and it appears to include a substantial copy of. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:30, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyright Violation in Finding Ko-Ko
Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  03:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Max Fleischer page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=739617219 your edit] caused a cite error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F739617219%7CMax Fleischer%5D%5D Ask for help])

Reference errors on 17 September
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
 * On the Rotoscoping page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=739867970 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F739867970%7CRotoscoping%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rotoscoping, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Composited. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 18 September 2016 (UTC)  The Adventure


 * Gentlemen:
 * I was asked to re-write the Wikipedia entry on Max Fleischer by McFarland Books, when my book, THE ART AND INVENTIONS OF MAX FLEISCHER: AMERICAN ANIMATION PIONEER was to be released in 2017. A considerable amount of time was spent rewriting a confused and amateurish entry done by unqualified writers. Since my submission, I have noticed inaccurate alterations to my text.  One of them is the reference to Max Fleischer being Polish and this being confirmed in my book.  This is false, and the footnote to page 7 clearly states that he was born when Krakow was in Austria.  Census and Immigration records confirm this as the country of origin, and the family also confirms this.  Having done the research on the political history of the Austria-Hungarian Empire and Poland,, the time line is correct, and a phase has been added that has remained for the last five years that explains that Krakow was in "then" Austria. Again, my book does not state that he was Polish. And the explanation of Krakow being in Austria at the time of Fleischer's birth contradicts and confuses and other statement liking him to Poland, which did not come into being until after World War I.  By this time, Max was an adult and beginning his animation career in New York.
 * The reference to the article FINDING KO-KO is one I wrote many years ago when I compiled a collection of the OUT OF THE INKWELL films for Home Video. And the URL link is to my website. When you go there you will clearly see my name on that article.  So in the interest of Copyright Violation we have none unless I register a complaint in that regard.  There is no Copyright Violation in my use of my own material since I AM THE SOURCE.
 * With further reference to Copyright Infringements, I noticed additional text has been added that is taken from my book, which diminishes its value. Has the person making these alterations been contacted?
 * Our history on this subject goes back to 2018. It is unfortunate that there is no realization that I am the authoritative source on this entry and the vast majority of the content comes from me.  Because Wikipedia is such a popular and easy access research source, I am sure that you want your entries to be as factual and complete as possible.  While there are inconsistencies with some of your other entries, every effort has been made to make the Max Fleischer and associated links as accurate and factual as possible after decades of confused information and fabrications.
 * Again, I am recognized as the leading authority on this subject. Accordingly there should be no issues about my entries or attempts to correct my own text entries after it has been altered by intrusion on the part of an unqualified party. This said, I would urge you to pay closer attention to the content and others who insist upon editing this content without authorization.  That said, I do not believe I need instruction on editing on Wikipedia. RayPointer (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gulliver's Travels (1939 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lilliput. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernard Wolf, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inbetweener. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Max Fleischer
Hi. In relation to your previous edit, Max Fleischer was born to a father from Dąbrowa Tarnowska (Poland) who lived sometime in Vienna I believe and to a Polish Jewish mother in Kraków, Poland, what was then multicultural Galicia. It is true that his decent "might" be Austrian, however, that would not make him Austrian. Someone Austrian-American would have to been born in Austria proper (i.e Austrian part of Austria-Hungary and not Galicia which was Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria). It is a difficult topic, and there are surely database sources claiming both, but in these situations you have to look at the details. The book by Ray Pointer "The Art and Inventions of Max Fleischer: American Animation Pioneer", states "Polish-American" nationality. Moreover his mother's surname was Palasz. Not very Austrian is it? Best regards. Oliszydlowski, 00:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Page 7 of THE ART AND INVENTIONS OF MAX FLEISCHER: AMERICAN ANIMATION PIONEER clearly explains the political issue of the placement of Krakow in 1883 as being in THEN Austria-Hungary. It does NOT say Poland.  I should know, I wrote it and did the research. The Fleischers always claimed to be from Austria. They originally spoke German, not Polish. The immigration and Census records confirm their national origin as Austria. It might be good to know what is referenced in the footnote to avoid confusion, and most of all know who you are addressing. RayPointer (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not change something that is clearly sourced in Max Fleischer. This may be treated as an act of vandalism and you will be blocked from editing. Oliszydlowski, 13:10, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi RayPointer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 12:22, Saturday, January 13, 2018 (UTC)

Dear Ray
My name is not Oli, so the message you left for me is probably intended for someone else. PS. I'd recommend posting your analysis on the talk of target article, and editing it directly. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 19:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries, mistakes happen, and MediaWiki software could be better - but it is worth remembering that Wikipedia operates on a shoe-string budget, particularly compared to giants like Facebook and such, who have budgets tens of thousands times bigger, while having roughly the same popularity :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 16:32, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, Amazon spent several billion dollars on just advertising last year or so. WMF budget is around ~50 millions. My point is that most major companies have hundreds or thousands of people working full time on their software, testing, doing focus groups, etc. Wiki software has maybe several people working on it, plus a bunch of volunteers. Further, Amazon doesn't have to ask the community about stuff. WMF does, and a lot of nice ideas were torpedoed because some fraction of community vehemently objected. There is sadly a significant, or at least, vocal, group of wiki editors/volunteers whose motto is 'Wikipedia is not Facebook/social site' and hate any attempts to make the user interface look newer/friendlier because 'pretty things are for the kids'. I am exaggerating a bit, but do you know how much hate and obstruction the introduction of the visual editor has encountered? I learned just a few days ago that the WP:THANKS extension had to be nerfed, because it had too many 'cool' features that said group thought were too social networky... Anyway. My point is that Wiki is a very different and pretty unique type of a site, and sadly, it means our software is pretty crappy, because we have super tiny budget, and an inefficient model (getting consensus from the community sounds fine, but it doesn't really work that well in practice, IMHO). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 18:42, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, consider the second factory: your website has to make you, the boss, happy. Wikipedia software, before it is released, has to be approved by hundreds of community members. Think how difficult it is to please such a big committee. I am not there but I believe the relevant discussions are always taking place at . Might be a good place to post your views of the software, etc. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 23:34, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi RayPointer! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:11, Monday, January 15, 2018 (UTC)

Warning
Please do not change something that is clearly sourced in Max Fleischer. This may be treated as an act of vandalism and you will be blocked from editing. Oliszydlowski, 18:54, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

April 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 03:08, 27 April 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

 * Gentlemen:
 * I would like to communicate with a live person within Wikipedia regarding the accusations of my making disruptive edits on my own text on the Max Fleischer entry. I am the major information source, as my book is cited in the footnotes.  In 2017, at the direction of my publisher, McFarland Books, I was asked to correct the previous entry  that was amateurishly written without accuracy or professional writing skill. The body of the current text was written by me and is based on the text from my book. It has remained for the most part on Wikipedia for the past five years.  Periodically certain erroneous statements are inserted into the text, contradicting the footnotes. Additional inserts irrelevant to the informational flow have been included by some outside party. I have recently corrected those areas.
 * There seems to be a robot interacting on this entry since it does not realize that I am the author. It has threatened me with accusations of Copyright Violations, and termination of my account for using my own material.  I am confused as to how using my own material violates my Copyright.  I am also puzzled by the accusation of vandalism when I am correcting what was written under accurate research.  The question is whether the same actions including the accusation of vandalism are taken with those who are making the alterations to a text that is already correct.
 * If anyone is reading this, I would greatly appreciate a response on these matters.
 * Very sincerely yours,
 * Ray Pointer RayPointer (talk) 14:36, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hal Le Roy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Lake. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ZaSu Pitts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The original reference to THE GALE STORM SHOW being on CBS is incorrect. It aired on ABC.  I am old enough to have seen it. It was replaced in the fall of 1960 by THE FLINTSTONES.  Therefore this minor correct needs to be accepted. RayPointer (talk) 11:58, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)