User talk:Ray Dassen

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Lst27 16:47, 1 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Rosicrucian article
Dear user Ray Dassen, as I have seen a edition of yours at the article Rosicrucian, I come to request your support to this article that I have just purposed for nomination at Featured_article_candidates. May you may give a look into it? And, if you consider it acceptable, then may you support it? Thank you! :) --GalaazV 02:49, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for rv back the Gothic Metal page from the Anon's version. Perhaps there will come a day on WP that the ability to edit articles will require a password, thus limiting intake of crude, anonymous editors. --Danteferno 18:07, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for Ceremonial magic revert
The insert you kindly removed was from the same anonymous "contributor" who has put the same text into Golden Dawn seven times as of now. If you like to see a Ceremonial magic article that is up to NPOV standards, you may need to put it on your watchlist as I have. Denial 21:22, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

Sammyo56
Thanks for nabbing a couple of his spams. The little troll hit a ton of articles. Grr. IainP (talk) 21:28, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, someone just beat me to it! Keep an eye out for user:131.123.253.253 as well. I think it's his IP address. Same link spam. Tosser. IainP (talk) 21:58, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Reminder...;
When using template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use &#123;&#123;subst:test&#125;&#125; instead of &#123;{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template. — Ian Manka Talk to me‼ 22:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

Biased editing of Technological Utopianism by Loremaster.
Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

I feel Loremaster is editing Singularitarianism and Technological utopianism in a biased manner in accordance with his Save The Earth propaganda. Loremasters's ideology seems to verge towards Neo-Luddism. Here are the damming facts Loremaster has stated in discussion:


 * Loremaster says he is:


 * Loremaster wants people to:


 * Loremaster sees his editing as a 'fight' and he states:

81.151.135.248 (talk) 11:48, 18 December 2010 (UTC)JB

--Loremaster (talk) 00:34, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * LOL
 * 1) Despite the fact that I openly admit to being a technorealist who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the Technological utopianism or Singularitarianism articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book Citizen Cyborg).
 * 2) I find it disgusting that 81.151.135.248 would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.
 * 3) In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Wikipedia.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Out_of_Control_(Kelly_book) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Out_of_Control_(Kelly_book) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Out_of_Control_(Kelly_book) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Balle010 (talk) 03:44, 14 September 2020 (UTC)