User talk:Rayabhari/Archive 7

Aam Aadmi Party
Thanks for your valuable opinion in the current discussion on battery operated Rickshaws in Delhi. In my opinion entire section 'protest' should be renamed to 'Aam Aadmi Party views'. Because every protest Aam Aadmi Party (or as a matter of fact any party) does shows us their views. If we see wikipedia article of 'Democratic Party of US' we can see their views & all of which does not have long term impact as well as all of which may not be equally decisive in future elections. Please let me know your thoughts on this & feel free to correct me wherever necessary.--ratastro 17:26, 18 September 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rushikesh.tilak (talk • contribs)

Regarding Dr. P. Keshava Bhat
Namasthe Rayabhari gale, a few months back you have suggested me to create a wiki page on Dr.P. Keshava Bhat and at that time it was not possible. But now i have created an article on Dr Pallathadka Keshava Bhat. I welcome your suggestions and additions for the development/improvement of the said article. Thank you and have a good time ahead!. --- Bharathiya (talk) 04:55, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
 * User:Bharathiya re! Namaskara. Thanks for above effort. I will read and try to contribute,if possible. Sources are scarce. Rayabhari (talk) 16:06, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Rayabhari gale, Yes I know, direct sources in english are limited, however there plenty of direct sources available in spanish as he is better known in Venezuela than here. We can use google translator and add good sources here. I have already added a few reliable sources like the University one. Thank you. -- Bharathiya (talk) 17:49, 15 August 2013 (UTC)


 * You may find it useful to approach someone who is familiar with Venezuela and presently active on the English Wikipedia. I notice that there are a few possible candidates at Category:Wikipedians in Venezuela. Failing that, we also have categories for people who can work with an excellent (or whatever) comprehension of a given foreign language, and someone in Category:User_es or similar might fit the bill. Google Translate is ok but far from great. - Sitush (talk) 18:01, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey! Sitush contacted me because seems like I'm the only active Wikipedian who lives in Venezuela. He told me that you were writing about an academic who settled in Venezuela (I assume it is Dr. P. Keshava Bhat). If you need any help translating any source, feel free to contact me at my talk with the sources you need information from and I will provide as much support as possible. Cheers! — ΛΧΣ  21  03:03, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Update. I have been reading the article and it looks good, though I have yet to do a deep check of sources. It takes time though :P — ΛΧΣ  21  22:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you Rayabhari (talk) 13:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Aam Aadmi Party debate
Can you please go through the talk page of this article & comment your opinion on 'battery operated rickshaw driver's protest'

Summary of it is as below.

Topic- Which of the two versions be preferred to go into the protest section of 'Article'

Option A -

ADD - The AAP has supported various regulatory complaints raised by rickshaw operators in Delhi.

KEEP - the rest of the 'protest' section as it is.

Option B -

ADD - On 16 September 2013, Aam Aadmi Party supported e-rickshaw driver's demand in Delhi that there should be a policy on battery operated rickshaws in the capital city to stop their exploitation by Delhi Transport Department. Party also said that a subsidy should be given to manual rickshaw drivers who want to purchase e-rickshaws. Earlier in June 2013, the party had supported agitations of rickshaw drivers against ban on advertisements on auto rickshaws alleging that the ban is imposed because most rickshaw drivers supported Aam Aadmi party & carried their banners.

remove - On 10 June 2013, Kejriwal supported the agitation of Delhi auto rickshaw drivers, who were protesting the Delhi government's ban on advertisements on auto rickshaws. Kejriwal claimed that, auto rickshaw drivers supported his party and they carried AAP's advertisements on their auto rickshaws and this is the reason for Delhi Government's ban and he challenged that volunteers of AAP will put 10,000 advertisements on auto rickshaws as a protest.

There is no conflict over the validity of citations.--ratastro (talk) 05:55, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Please stop running around and asking random people on their talk pages. Have the discussion on the article talk page. If we later need uninvolved people, there are several neutral processes for doing so described on WP:DR. What you are doing now violates WP:CANVAS, because you are telling currently uninvolved people the "correct" opinion (which, of course, happens to match your own). Qwyrxian (talk) 10:12, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Rayabhari was one of the editors who had earlier participated in the AAP talk page. That is the reason I am urging him to share his opinion. This is nowhere related to Canvassing a) While putting the  options there, I did not say which one is mine, b) I have also requested the editor to come to the talk page & share his opinion (which he has done once earlier). Qwyrxian, I would suggest using my talk page for such activities. @Rayabhari Apologies for using your talkpage while answering Qwyrxian.--ratastro (talk) 10:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
 * You shouldn't have summarised the discussion here. You probably should not even have mentioned it here because it is already evident that Rayabhari has been participating for some time at the AAP article. If you must say something then you should say it to all people who have participated recently - not just to those who seem perhaps to favour your opinion, as you have done - and you should limited yourself to a neutral single sentence or so. For example, "Do you intend to add anything to the discussion at Talk:Aam Aadmi Party in which you recently participated?" - Sitush (talk) 12:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)


 * @Sitush, The same summary was given on Sitush (you), Qwyrxian as well as Binksternet's talk pages & all of these editors do not share my opinion. In case you have missed the point, which seems to be the case, allow me to reiterate again the fact which I explained to Qwyrxian, that while giving the summary, I did not say which option is my opinion anywhere on anybody's talk page unless I received an answer from them. Moreover anybody who properly reads my message will see that the message begins with "Can you please go through the talk page of this article".--ratastro (talk) 18:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Aam Aadmi_Party". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot   operator  /  talk 07:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Rahul Gandhi#Caste?
Dear Rayabhari, I hope You had a safe Diwali. I would like to respectfully ask You to comment at Talk:Rahul Gandhi; a discussion that You started. Actually, We need to have the last word. Sincerely, ← Abstruce  17:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Dear Rayabhari, You may have had a misunderstanding. Please view My comments there. Thanks !! ← Abstruce  18:51, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Warning for Vandalisation of an article by the user
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Aam aadmi party, you may be blocked from editing. KLS 08:36, 20 January 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kswarrior (talk • contribs)
 * Disregard this "warning". Drmies (talk) 00:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Aam Aadmi Party
Hello Rayabhari, I encourage you to start editing the talk page, and to comment on or explain your edits there. This is a cooperative project, and that means that communication in contentious matters is not just encouraged--it's mandatory. Explanations in edit summaries are good, but they are usually not deemed sufficient. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Shimoga
See if the list is ok and do inform me if there is something that needs to be added or removed. User:Shriram/sandbox  Shriram  Talk 18:05, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

URGENT Intervention
Namaskara Sir, I require your kind and urgent intervention on Harikumar Pallathadka page and its talk page. I feel that i am being bullied to remove the content which is having reliable sources. Just because he feels otherwise. Well am ok with the editing of the content but prejudiced removing is unfair. Kindly join the talk. Look forward for your views on the same. Thanks. -- Bharathiya (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari
There's nothing stopping you from recreating a page that was previously deleted, as long as your recreated version isn't eligible for deletion. If it is then it will be deleted just like any other page. In fact the only content in the version of this article I deleted in 2007 was "I am saptarshi Chatterjee. Hi................". As you can see it doesn't give the reader any meaningful information, and that is why I deleted it. I'm sure you can do better. Hut 8.5 20:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Can you kindly visit the page The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari now and give your valuable suggestions? Rayabhari (talk) 05:12, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * My main suggestion would be to improve the sourcing. The article only cites one source that is independent of the book's publishers at the moment. Adding more reliable independent sources would produce a better demonstration of notability. Hut 8.5 07:37, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thanks. Rayabhari (talk) 07:39, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Cover page,The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari.jpeg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cover page,The Monk Who Sold His Ferrari.jpeg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Jashodaben Modi for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jashodaben Modi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jashodaben Modi & until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Redtigerxyz Talk 14:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Dorla people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Bastar


 * Haigunda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Kadamba

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kittur Rani Chennamma (postal stamp).jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Kittur Rani Chennamma (postal stamp).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gorta, Bidar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Razakar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey!
A new contributor has just posted a note on my talk page and it made me think of you. You're obviously still around but your name has not appeared much on my watchlist of late. I hope that things are going ok and, well, I've just noticed that you come from Bangalore. Now, I'm a Brit and there is no Indian blood in me but I recently found documents that prove my great-great-grandmother was born there in the 1840s. Unfortunately, her dad was on the wrong side - a soldier in the 15th Hussars! As if that weren't bad enough, last year I discovered an even older ancestor was born in the West Indies and his father was a Moravian missionary from Germany or Denmark who owned slaves while in the Caribbean. I've got some ugly skeletons in the family closet :( - Sitush (talk) 20:14, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for concern / remembering me. Your guidance was of great help for me to contribute. But sometimes, it is frustrating, when my edits are reverted without reason! e.g. Gol Gumbaz. I am a little busy in real life activities : in India, the working hours sometime extend from 10 am. to 8 pm plus time taken for returning from office : then I find little time to contribute. Regarding your connection with Bangalore, I knew of it when glancing through your talk page about a year ago.  I donot agree it as ugly skeleton, because I consider it as  historical statistics, maybe long forgotten! What we do now, today or this year or this decade matters most. Thanks. -Rayabhari (talk) 09:37, 21 July 2014 (UTC)