User talk:Raymond Leonard

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Old Palace, Ely has been accepted
 The Old Palace, Ely, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! &mdash; Rod talk 18:28, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=The_Old_Palace,_Ely help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

January 2018
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 'Welcome to wikipedia. Please do not edit war in articles as this can lead to an administrative review of your editing privileges. Please avoid adding content based on websites / blogs or other questionable sources, do review the WP:RS guidelines of wikipedia. Your cooperation is requested,' Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 13:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Thanks, MSW. This response, though, by Raymond, was quite good.  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   19:24, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Wiki-policies and make-up
Hi Raymond. See WP:RS for a starter. Also, when you post a message, sign with four tildes: ~. It will automatically change into your username, and links to your talkpage. If you need any help, please contact me, either at my talkpage, or by using at a talkpage. And by the way: Buddhism is a vast topic. I've been studying it for nearly 30 years now; and while I think I have some basic understanding, I'm also overwhelmed once and a while by the recognition of everything that I don't know abput Buddhism, and Never will know. Best regards,  Joshua Jonathan   -  Let's talk!   19:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Free Will
Please use the talk page to discuss changes which have been rejected - its not good practice to wait a bit and try again :-)   WP:BRD gives you guidance there  Snowded  TALK 19:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A concise chinese english dictionary for lovers


A tag has been placed on A concise chinese english dictionary for lovers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://allreaders.com/book-review-summary/concise-chinese-english-dictionary-lovers-39011. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &#x2230; Bellezzasolo &#x2721;  Discuss  22:40, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Sign your posts
Sign your comment at Talk:2019 Indigenous Peoples March Incident. Thanks.-Inowen (nlfte) 22:37, 23 January 2019 (UTC)