User talk:Raymond R.C. Hsièh

July 2016
We just state the cited facts on United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2758, without offering an opinion of our own. The article's talk page is for discussion about how to improve the article. Your barely readable screed has no place in either.--Atlan (talk) 10:30, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

The Disputables of the UN Resolution 2758
1, the General Assembly may only discuss questions and matters. – Article 10. 2, except for cases provided for in Article 6 of the Charter, the General Assembly shall have no power to expel. (ref. §19 “Expulsion”) 3, the General Assembly is not a legal dispute settling body. Before relevant dispute being settled (no matter whether settled through domestic negotiations between the Parties or via international mediation), GA shall have no power to dictate which political entity of a member country send representative to the UN to the expelling of the other political entity of the same member country, intentionally and purposefully ignoring the fact that the latter has been legally incumbent at the seat for decades from the inception of UN. 4, GA alleged that “representatives of Chiang Kai-shek... unlawfully occupy at the United Nations”. As this allegation concerns “Lawfulness”, GA shall have obligation to produce admissible evidence to support such allegation. An empty allegation shall not be admitted to be considered in respect of a GA resolution. 5, according to Article 10, the General Assembly may discuss any questions or any matters within the scope of the present Charter. As diplomatic recognition (or any act implying diplomatic recognizing) is not within the scope of the UN Charter, the word “recognize” appearing in line 2 of paragraph 5 shall neither have nor cover any meanings of Diplomatic Recognition.