User talk:Raynerco

October 2021
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Roger Law, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. -- VViking Talk Edits 13:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
In this edit to Roger Law's biography, your edit summary stated Multiple updates provided by Roger Law. From this, I surmise that you are editing at Wikipedia on Mr Law's behalf. This constitutes a conflict of interest: since you have a relationship with Mr Law, you should not be editing his article. Further, if he or anyone else is paying you to edit his biography, you must disclose this fact per Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Again, you have added "Content provided by Roger Law." Wikipedia is not a webhosting service wherein subjects get to write what they want about themselves. Instead, it is an encyclopedia where we report, in neutral language, what reliable sources have written or said about the subject. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

COI Promotional editing
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. -- VViking Talk Edits 14:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)