User talk:Raysacks

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Kila, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Craig Stuntz 19:52, 2 November 2005 (UTC)

My big boxes
I put in the big boxes because I think they are informative, different (so my Userpage doesn't just look like a clone of many thousands of others) and aestetically pleasing (at least in my opinion). And it shows how good at using the Mediawiki markup, to create such nice boxes. I am fine BTW, good in fact, and will be back in London next weekend, so might see you around/at the pub. If not, I am home for the holidays in three weekends' time anyway, so we can catch up then. Hope you are OK, and don't let school get you down. Batmanand | Talk 17:28, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Pheromone on Science Collaboration
Congratulations! Pheromone, the Science Collaboration nominee for whom you voted, has won, and is now the Science Collaboration of the Week! Please help us improve the article as much as you can. - User:Samsara (talk • contribs) 00:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

"Silly"
I would go so far as to say they are "left hand up lame". Batmanand | Talk 13:30, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:02, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Notability of St George's Medics Revue
A tag has been placed on St George's Medics Revue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 00:44, 18 September 2008 (UTC)