User talk:Rayukk/Archive 1

File permission problem with File:Kiki's American Adventure Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kiki's American Adventure Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:17, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:Joshua Files All 5 Books.png
Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Joshua Files All 5 Books.png, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Joshua Files All 5 Books.png appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Joshua Files All 5 Books.png has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Joshua Files All 5 Books.png and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Joshua Files All 5 Books.png with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Joshua Files All 5 Books.png.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:37, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Madison Scott


The article Madison Scott has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for pornographic actors

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 17:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madison Scott


A tag has been placed on Madison Scott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. OrenBochman 06:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Madison Scott for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madison Scott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Madison Scott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Arms &amp; Hearts (talk) 20:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Repost of Riley Reid
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Riley Reid


A tag has been placed on Riley Reid requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Peridon (talk) 17:44, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Status and Advice
besides giving her age and profession, the article provided no information whatsoever. If you want to try again, gives some sourced information for why she might me important. To stay in WP, the article needs references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. The criteria for notability are at WP:PORNBIO.  DGG ( talk ) 16:25, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

There Is a Cheeseburger for you question
I noticed your picture of a cheeseburger. You typed, "There is a cheeseburger for you" to User:DGG. What is that for? Thanks. Ashbeckjonathan 21:13, 29 November 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashbeckjonathan (talk • contribs)

VitalyzdTv
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: VitalyzdTv. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of VitalyzdTv


The article VitalyzdTv has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Way 2 veers 02:36, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up, I added some references --Rayukk (talk) 11:15, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Equals 3 new cover.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Equals 3 new cover.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

http://k005.kiwi6.com/hotlink/rpa1lm0y58/bye_bye.mp3

License tagging for File:Breaking Bad season five part i and ii dvd.png
Thanks for uploading File:Breaking Bad season five part i and ii dvd.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Breaking bad
Glad to see someone did tackle the intro. Good to see that Talk pages still work. Thanks, Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 11:54, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Madison Ivy


A tag has been placed on Madison Ivy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:48, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madison Ivy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Vitaly Zdorovetskiy-University Press Interview.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vitaly Zdorovetskiy-University Press Interview.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vitaly Zdorovetskiy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Vitaly Zdorovetskiy University Press2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vitaly Zdorovetskiy University Press2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January ( talk ) 12:45, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:FL Studio 11 black logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:FL Studio 11 black logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Vitaly Zdorovetskiy University Press2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vitaly Zdorovetskiy University Press2013.jpg, which you've attributed to. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:42, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fotopedia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sync. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=633527276 your edit] to Daimler AG may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:41, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daimler AG, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Freightliner, Tuscaloosa and Hambach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Soul Town Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Soul Town Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. &mdash;Cryptic 08:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Airports Council International Logo.svg
Thanks for uploading File:Airports Council International Logo.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pixomondo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CG. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sirius XM 1st Wave Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sirius XM 1st Wave Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Removal of cleanup templates
Please do not remove cleanup templates without fixing the problem. In particular, you removed a plot template without streamlining the plot. As WP:FILMPLOT says, plots should be between 400 and 700 words. We welcome your contributions to Chappie (film), but if you are going to contribute to film-related articles, you may wish to read MOS:FILM to familiarize yourself with how they are written. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:24, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

88th Academy Awards
Saw you put that on the DAB page-so I decided then to created 88th Academy Awards as a redirect for the time being! Wgolf (talk) 21:56, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Flockaveli 2, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Drake and Southside. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Euroflags
May I direct you to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision/Archive 12. Please make sure you gain consensus for the changes, remember consensus can change. :) --  [[  axg  // ✉  ]] 11:37, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I reverted the last of the edits. Should have taken a look at that beforehand :D Rayukk (talk) 11:43, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Template:Game of Thrones RT scores S5
I noticed you saw the massive graphing error that results when one adds 88 as a RT score. I have no idea why it does that, but thanks for changing it to 87.9! I've added a notice for those who decide to change it again. Alex &#124; The &#124; Whovian 08:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * What the heck is up with that .. OK, thank you. Good to know. Rayukk (talk) 08:47, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GoT-S05 E10 Jon Snows Death.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:GoT-S05 E10 Jon Snows Death.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 12:47, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

The Revenant
Hello, regarding your edit at The Revenant (2015 film), I assume you added the template due to a lack of inline citations in the lead section. Per WP:LEADCITE, since the section is a summary of the article body (which is fully cited), there does not necessarily need to be citations in it (though it is recommended for controversial statements). Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 15:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh no, that's not why I added the template. I thought that "inline citations" meant that the references literally have to be right next to the content they are referencing, which is not the case in the article (they are all at the end). My mistake. Greetings, Rayukk (talk) 16:31, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh, yeah! That approach. It is used to cut down on clutter in the code for the article body. I personally find it tricky, though, since you have to edit the whole article and not just one section to follow that approach consistently. I personally prefer doing this approach with list articles but keeping in prose articles the inline citations' actual details right next to the relevant passages. All good, then! :) Erik (talk &#124; contrib) (ping me) 17:07, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Table Format
What's wrong with the titles being highlighted? Typhoon966 (talk) 11:12, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Not trying to be hostile here, I read WP:FILMOGRAPHY and it did not specifically say that highlighting titles are prohibited. Typhoon966 (talk) 11:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, although it doesn't explicitly say highlighting titles isn't allowed, the example tables all have un-highlighted titles, so do about 99% of filmography articles on Wikipedia. It is even the case in almost all discographies like for example Hans Zimmer discography. I was merely trying to keep a little consistency going within these filmographies. Technically though, since it doesn't specifically say so in the guidelines, the highlighting would be allowed, but I hope you agree with me that it would be more suitable with them unbolded? Sorry for being so harsh, but I thought I remembered the guidelines saying "no highlighting". :) Greetings. r a y u k k. 21:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 * It's okay. Anyway, since examples in the guidelines don't have titles in the tables highlighted, I've made changes to other composer pages which I've previously edited to the same format. Typhoon966 (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2015 (UTC)