User talk:Rayzenberg

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.)
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the [ reviewer's talk page]. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 20:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi Dude, it's Pericles
Hey there big guy. Pericles here. So by "quality standards" they do not mean quality of content, considering your elegant writing, logical prose, and hefty amount of scholarly citations. I believe they are referring solely to the Manual of Style. It deals with article layout, organization, and a bunch of little nit-picky rules that have simply become second nature to me when I create an article. However, for a new kid on the block like you this might seem a bit daunting. I don't see anything on your page that is particularly out of place or would warrant such a tag. Therefore, I think you should take this up with User:JorisvS at his talk page, the Wikipedia editor who placed the tag there in the first place. Clicking the "history" tag on the top of the article page brings you to this site here, where you can see the history of who edited your article, when they edited it, and exactly how they amended it. After reading a few comments on his talk page, he sounds like something of a stickler so please be polite! He also shows a clear interest in psychology topics, so he might actually be a psychologist as well. Cheers.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 09:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Self-Concealment concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Self-Concealment, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 07:12, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Self-Concealment


Hello Rayzenberg. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Self-Concealment.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)