User talk:Rayzi Nwaoha

Rayzi
Elect/Elect Engr || Award Winning Blogger || Musician || Talent Manager || Online HypeMan Rayzi Nwaoha (talk) 07:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of OGdoings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OGdoings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/OGdoings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Setreis (talk) 16:32, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Rayzi Nwaoha


A tag has been placed on User:Rayzi Nwaoha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Celestina007 (talk) 22:14, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of OGdoings for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article OGdoings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/OGdoings& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Setreis (talk) 08:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Warning
If you are only here to write about yourself and your website, providing unverifiable autobiographical content, then you are here for very much the wrong reasons. Write about something else not in your self-interest, in a way that is verifiable from good, independent, sources; or do not write at all. If you persist, someone like me will just take your writing privileges away. Uncle G (talk) 09:36, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Conflict of interest
 * Verifiability
 * Independent sources

You were warned, and you persisted anyway. The page, your sandbox, and your editing privileges are now gone. Uncle G (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of OGdoings


A tag has been placed on OGdoings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/OGdoings. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:52, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at OGdoings. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:53, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Rayzi Nwaoha. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to OGdoings, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rayzi Nwaoha. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:54, 2 April 2021 (UTC)