User talk:Razorback216

Welcome!

Hello, Razorback216, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Gaza Flotilla Raid: picture
Hi Razorback, a warm welcome to wikipedia. As you can see, things get a bit rough here at times. I hope you will enjoy editing and stay. The longer you stay, the more reliable you are treated as.

Don't forget to sign your posts using four tildes, as in the brief welcome message on top.

I'll try to insert the picture if I can. It seems relevant. ManasShaikh (talk) 12:27, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Opinion
Please provide your opinion about the lead in Gaza Flotilla raid whether the fact that the activists were killed in close range should be reported. Talk:Gaza_flotilla_raid (Although yours is a new account, the talk page is editable by all users.) Please do this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.155.243.106 (talk) 22:52, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Gaza War
Don't edit war and don't use edit summaries to debate. Please also review the archives if you have not so already and don't forget to sign your comments with 4 tildes.Cptnono (talk) 02:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * It is not me you need to convince so your message would be better at the talk page. If you looked at the archives I am sure you would see a long drawn out thread started by RomaC where multiple editors agreed to trim that information. You need to abide by consensus (even if you do not agree with it) and WP:BRD. You also need to be aware that this is a contentious article that takes increased levels of caution to edit. So revert yourself and use the talk page to its full potential or else I suspect someone else or myself will make the revert. You may have a point and that is fine. You might even succeed in changing consensus. Just use the talk page instead of reverting and there should not be any problems.Cptnono (talk) 03:00, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Great, I did exactly that. My perspective, in addition to protests by others indicates a clear lack of consensus for the cutting of the vital info.
 * Have you ever made an edit under a different account or using an IP and if so, what was the name of the account?--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 15:19, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Have you ever edited under the following accounts Remi14 or Salubrious-inca--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 00:14, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Have you ever edited from California?--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 01:18, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Hello
Note your good-faith edits on Gaza War were reverted, suggest you please participate on Talk. RomaC (talk) 16:15, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Warning
ANI filed --Jiujitsuguy (talk) 19:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

November 2010
SPI--Jiujitsuguy (talk) 05:31, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 13:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

Notification
As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.


 * Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
 * The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
 * Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
 * Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here. PhilKnight (talk) 15:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)