User talk:Rbanzai/Archives/2008/September

Coatrack Argument for Deletions
Hi, I'm new. I wrote the above to try to get consensus on a policy, or whatever it is called here, after summariazing all the arguments I read on the Obama church and Palin church debates, to abstract and summarize the essentials of the arguments based on Coatrack. My idea is that admins and editors are wasting a lot of time arguing policy, then re-arguing the exact same policy, with nothing gained from the previous arguments. The previous arguments are long, full of repetitions, and have stuff that makes little sense. But they also have essential ideas, which merit saving. The same admins and editors could be spending the same time contributing to the actual CONTENT of articles. I thought of this when I saw an admin who is a mathematician having to slog through stuff written in the heat of religous fervor, which might not have been written otherwise, and it seemed like his time would be best spent doing les meta- level stuff. I was thinking editors could resolve issues without involving admins. I am a mathematician, too, and am spending a lot of time on easily avoided discussion. Can you help me figure out wher I should be doing this? Please respond in the section you created on my page, so I don't clutter your talk page up. Thnx EricDiesel (talk) 15:53, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Don't threaten me please
Please do make threats at me. I created a very worthwhile article and just because I am defending it, you are threatening me? That is tantamount to bullying and goes agains everything that Wikipedia and freedom of speech stands for. --Bravo Plantation (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I gave you a warning for deleting the Afd template from your Jubbly article. It's not a threat. It's an alert that you violated Wikipedia policy. Rob Banzai (talk) 16:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

A suggestion
Then if it was just meant as an 'alert', could I suggest that you reword these in future as I found it very intimidating. Thanks --Bravo Plantation (talk) 16:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand. I use a piece of software called Twinkle that auto-generate the warnings. They sound stern because deletion of Afd and CSD templates is pretty common among people who want to bypass the procedures and then it turns into a mess. No intimidation intended. :) Rob Banzai (talk) 16:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Page Deletion
You deleted my autobiographical page Jacob Houston could you please return it? I saved because i had to go to the store but when i came back it was gone :( thnx --AlexisMe (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Deep Dish (novel)
The article is not an advertisement. I was just trying to show the book's notability by adding reviews. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 21:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Mlandry/Loriento Riding Academy
Be kind to noobies. I userfied the page, and promise to watch it. Bearian (talk) 22:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC) OOps, I fixed the syntax. Bearian (talk) 22:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't think I can "userfy" pages that otherwise should be speedied. Glad you took care of that. Rob Banzai (talk) 23:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Jarrod Cochran Deletion
What do you suggest I put on this page? Rev. Cochran is a respected leader within the Progressive Christian community and a highly praised author from several people who have pages on this site. I attempted to put those things up here only to have the page deleted before I could get all of the content together. I did not realize that this was a previously deleted article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polarcapp (talk • contribs) 18:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

RE: Jarrod Cochran Deletion
How am I able to do that with the page being blocked? I appreciate the help Polarcapp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Polarcapp (talk • contribs) 18:06, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

tekken theories should stay
The reason why I made this page is so that many fans could come and talk about the tekken game and comics series. many of us has talk to one of the tekken comic producer, and she has told us that many of tekken stories is mix up, the producer says that namco has defferent stories about tekken, and many people have question and theories. So I came up with tekken theories because namco have the game series defferent from the comics series, so i wanted to tell the defference between them, and tell the theories about them. I still want to work on the language and corrections on the page so that I can make it out of an artical. 66.142.240.42 (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)Teriko66.142.240.42 (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Unknown2020 i agree with teriko. it should, due to the fact that almost every so called fact about tekken story is not really said on the games, like angel being kazuya's other half, its a theory because it is not said on any tekken games whats so ever. so i do think a tekken theories page should be made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknown2020 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Ace2690 i agree that page should stay.