User talk:Rbdwalker

Welcome!

 * }

February 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Ebuyer has been reverted. Your edit here to Ebuyer was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/ebuyer) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Reverting edits to Ebuyer
Hi Rbdwalker - I've reverted the edits you made to Ebuyer. Wikipedia isn't a place to advertise a company or promote it in a solely positive light. If you've got edits to make that are backed up by reliable sources, please feel free to make them Alex Muller  10:08, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ebuyer. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Yunshui 雲&zwj;水 13:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Rbdwalker -- once again, please stop simply reverting the article so that it takes such a promotional tone. If you want to discuss these edits (if you think they're accurate) please do so on the article talk page. But please stop simply continuing to make those same changes to the article over and over. Many thanks, Alex Muller  15:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012
Hello Rbdwalker. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Ebuyer, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.  Ol Yeller21 Talktome  16:29, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wren Living Logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Wren Living Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:05, 2 September 2014 (UTC)