User talk:Rberggren/sandbox

Feedback Dr. V
Hi, Rberggren - I encourage you to work through each of your sources carefully this weekend. What are the next steps to fill in the outline you propose? Once you have organized and written about the research you've completed, we can assess next steps. Let's talk about where to go next as soon as possible. Also, please write a paragraph at the top explaining what you need from peer editors once you have completed this task. Please post your plans on the talk page of the Walkabout article, too. Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 14:18, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Feedback from Natalie Deerr
Hello, Rachel! I think you have a good start. I have included suggestions for edits in the sections. I think that you definitely could use more cohesion in general as right now it's more of an outline. Your lead then will have more substance to cover. Keep working towards the 2000 words! I also linked to other pages for you in your lead paragraph, so continue to do that throughout. Good luck! :) Nataliedeerr (talk) 02:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Angela's Feedback
1.	Some of your sentences seem really long. For example your first sentence: “Walkabout refers to a Rite of passage during which male Australian Aboriginals would undergo a journey during adolescence and live in the wilderness for a period as long as six months to make the transition into manhood as a deeply spiritual awakening.” There are too many thoughts in one sentence. I’d break it up to have one thought per sentence. For example: “Walkabout refers to a Rite of passage during adolescence which male Australian Aboriginals go on a journey. These Australian youths live in the wilderness for a period as long as six months to make the transition into manhood as a deeply spiritual awakening. 2.	“This transtionary period typically takes place between the ages of 10 to 16 years of age.” There is repetitiveness in this sentence. Only need “ages of 10 to 16” or “between the ages of 10 to 16.” 3.	Again, break up sentences to have one thought in them, otherwise simple minded readers like myself get confused. I broke this sentence up to look like: “Merriam-Webster identifies the noun as a 1908 coinage referring to "a short period of wandering bush life engaged in by an Australian Aborigine as an occasional interruption of regular work." The only mention of "spiritual journey" comes up in a usage example from a latter-day travel writer.” 4.	I took out a few words that add bias or were just unnecessary. Words like “however” 5.	I’d reconstruct this sentence so it doesn’t start with the word “but”: “But to non-aboriginal employers who did not fully understand the abrupt leaving and returning as a valid reason for missing work.” I’d change it to something like “Non-aboriginal employers did not fully understand the abrupt leaving and returning and did not see it as a valid reason for missing work.” 6.	Aboriginal endosociality has been considered to be partly a product of the same racism that gave rise to the myth of walkabout as a derogatory term but it is also a product of the distinctive indigenous culture its emphasis on the relational constitution of the person and the importance of place in the constitution of personal identity. 7.	This is too long of a sentence. “The physical geography of the Australian Outback has fundamentally shaped Indigenous socio-spatial organization, and thus mobility practices, for the lack of population density in these areas and the uncharted aura of these areas, it is not uncommon that the Outback is the typical home to walkabout for aboriginals have ancestral ties to the land.” I would break it up to look like: “The physical geography of the Australian Outback has fundamentally shaped Indigenous socio-spatial organization. Thus mobility practices, for the lack of population density in these areas and the uncharted aura of these areas, is not uncommon to the Outback. It is the typical home to walkabout for aboriginals have ancestral ties to the land.” (not sure if this gets across the message you wanted but the original sentence was too confusing for me to follow.) 8.	I feel like you could go into the spiritual piece of this rite of passage more. Your last sentence touches on it but I almost feel like it’s an after thought. “The spiritual attachment of aboriginals to the land of the Outback was a strong, unbreakable force that rooted social groups within their traditional territories.” — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrogers (talk • contribs) 00:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)