User talk:Rbmacdonald

Welcome!
Hello, Rbmacdonald, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions have removed content without an explanation. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 21:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

September 2016
Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Torben Sondergaard without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. KylieTastic (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Torben Sondergaard, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Since three sources are cited in the text you removed, you really need to explain the problems with the sources on the talk page and get consensus before removing the information. —C.Fred (talk) 21:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia Policies
You should read Five pillars and What Wikipedia is not to understand what Wikipedia is for. It is not for positive promotion as the facebook post asked for. Wikipedia just summaries the information good, neutral and bad as reported by reliable sources. KylieTastic (talk) 21:23, 14 September 2016 (UTC)