User talk:Rbnccarter

I have references for the material that I have added. Its all over the web and its printed in several books. Welcome!

Hello, Rbnccarter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Yazidi Book of Revelation does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 22:38, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Dear Rbnccarter, I've reverted your edits on the page Yazidi Book of Revelation again because they seem to introduce all kinds of unrelated material into the page. Also, the text of the book is already available on Wikisource, and it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 22:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

I have reverted it back because it does belong on Wikipedia. Please provide me with a detailed explanation why this does not belong on Wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rbnccarter (talk • contribs)


 * The extensive quotations are not encyclopedic content, and belong on Wikisource. The rest of the edits seem to be describing an organisation, while the article is about a book, and the relation between the two is not clear at all. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 23:45, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

There is nothing in the literature describing an organization. This is all educational doucunentaion that has never been added to Wikipedia.