User talk:Rbsteeves

Welcome

 * }

Proposed deletion of PEERNET Reports


The article PEERNET Reports has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable software.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TN X Man 20:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File conversion center


The article File conversion center has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-Notable software

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 15:09, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of TIFF Image Printer


The article TIFF Image Printer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-Notiable software

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Codf1977 (talk) 15:10, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of PEERNET Reports
I have nominated PEERNET Reports, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/PEERNET Reports. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TN X Man 15:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Your article submission PEERNET Reports


Hello Rbsteeves. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled PEERNET Reports.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e deckertalk 18:26, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of PDF Creator Plus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PDF Creator Plus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/PDF Creator Plus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of TIFF Image Printer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TIFF Image Printer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/TIFF Image Printer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of File conversion center for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article File conversion center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/File conversion center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash; Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 15:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)