User talk:Rchlxndr

A page you started (Frederica Annis Lopez de Leo de Laguna) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Frederica Annis Lopez de Leo de Laguna, Rchlxndr!

Wikipedia editor Narvekar ameya just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This is reviewed."

To reply, leave a comment on Narvekar ameya's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Welcome!
Hello, Rchlxndr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Jacqueline Cochran. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Binksternet (talk) 14:29, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Disambiguation link notification for July 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Elizabeth C. Crosby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Henry Russell


 * Emma Reh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Santa Elena


 * Frederica Annis Lopez de Leo de Laguna (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Distinguished Service Award

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Jacqueline Cochran
Note that styles of editing being already established should not be changed unless there is a reason. See WP:Retain. As well, there is no requirement to use citation templates when other forms of accurate and correctly formatted bibliographic styles are in place. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 19:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Avoiding cut-and-paste article moves
Hi. I see that you created a new page for Frederica de Laguna, then mined the information from the existing page and redirected the title to your new page. I believe you started the new page for a very good reason -- because the new version of her name appeared as a redlink on a "missing articles" list. Unfortunately, the result of these actions was something that is considered a "cut and paste page move", which should be avoided for a variety of reasons -- in particular because it loses the page history that Wikipedia needs for copyright reasons (see How to fix cut-and-paste moves for more information than you want to know about this topic).

I fixed the situation by merging the histories of the two pages, and I'm telling you about this for your future information. Also note that I chose the previous article name of Frederica de Laguna. This is consistent with Wikipedia's guidance on article titles, which says we use the names by which people were most commonly known, not their full legal names.

Thanks for your contributions! If in the future you find that you accidentally created a new page that duplicates an existing page under a different name, please don't try to patch things up on your own. Instead, ask an administrator for help getting the situation fixed. --Orlady (talk) 19:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Jane Blankenship Gibson 1961.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Jane Blankenship Gibson 1961.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Feather expert Roxie Laybourne.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Feather expert Roxie Laybourne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 30 April 2020 (UTC)