User talk:Rchubbard

April 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Jackson Township, New Jersey, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 00:25, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Jackson Township, New Jersey, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Alansohn (talk) 03:09, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 13:29, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

{{ unblock request | the block is no longer necessary because I

understand what Ihave been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead.

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I was unaware of the full process for editing an article. I will adhere to the rules in the future. Please unblock me. Rchubbard (talk) 19:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC) | decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
 * the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
 * the block is no longer necessary because you
 * understand what you have been blocked for,
 * will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
 * will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2020 (UTC)}} please allow my edit capabilities. it’s been blocked for over a month now without a valid reason. Rchubbard (talk) 15:04, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You cannot simultaneously claim that you were "unaware of the full process for editing an article. I will adhere to the rules in the future." and "it's been blocked for over a month now without a valid reason." Either the block is legitimate and your edits were inappropriate, or your edits were fine and the block is not legitimate. You need to pick one position or the other and state your case in your unblock review. --Yamla (talk) 19:54, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * You were blocked for edit warring and repeatedly blanking content. Perhaps you can clarify how you will edit differently in the future, and what you would edit if unblocked. CaptainEek  {{sup|  Edits Ho Cap'n!  }}⚓ 19:57, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed | 1= the block is no longer necessary because I understand what you I was blocked for, you will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead | decline = You have only copied and pasted the points you were asked to respond to. You need to give specific answers to those points in your own words. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:33, 27 May 2020 (UTC)}}