User talk:Rcjumpman45

Proposed deletion of Jaclyn lampkin


The article Jaclyn lampkin has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Some assertion of notability but no reliable sources that would allow the reader to assess the claims; no verifiablility

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Accounting4Taste: talk 20:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD Nomination: Jaclyn lampkin
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but all Wikipedia articles must meet our criteria for inclusion (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Jaclyn lampkin meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Jaclyn lampkin. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. Accounting4Taste: talk 21:26, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove the deletion tag from any page before the discussion is complete. You may make your case against the deletion of the page at Articles for deletion/Jaclyn lampkin. Continued removal of the deletion tag will not stop the deletion discussion and is grounds for blocking. Thank you. Vicenarian  (Said · Done) 21:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Wikipedia talk:Questions has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 21:34, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Talk:Lana Edwards. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Doniago (talk) 21:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Jaclyn lampkin. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Doniago (talk) 21:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jeffrey Mall (talk • contribs) - 21:37, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 21:40, 17 August 2009 (UTC)