User talk:Rcs-confidential

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thanatology Café (November 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thanatology Café and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:14, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Your addition to Draft:Thanatology Café has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:45, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tokyogirl79. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Rcs-confidential. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
 * I have no problem with you trying again at AfC, but please be careful. Do not use copyrighted material. Not only does this violate WP:COPYVIO, but in most cases the content is written in a promotional manner and is not appropriate for Wikipedia, as was the case here. You also need to be careful about adding content and blogs to pages already on Wikipedia - not all content is considered to be appropriate for Wikipedia. The general rule of thumb is that unless the person and/or blog has received enough independent WP:RS coverage to justify inclusion in Wikipedia (preferably enough to justify their own article), then odds are it doesn't need to be added. Adding the blog links can also come across as promotional, since you hotlinked to them in the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  06:48, 9 November 2016 (UTC)