User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/13

Internal copying
I see that you created the article Mark Olf, with the edit summary "create article from other user's sandbox". This is, I'm afraid, unacceptable, because copying someone else's contributions without saying whose contributions and where you copied then from is a breach of the author's copyright. Wikipedia content is licensed for reuse under a very broad free license, but the terms of that license require that such reuse must be attributed. Can you say where you copied it from? JamesBWatson (talk) 12:37, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * This appears to be from User:Jmolf/sandbox. We should probably slap the sandbox history onto the beginning of the history of this one. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  12:44, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I think they asked me to move it but I still wanted to leave them with a sandbox instead of moving it. So I just copied it.  Rcsprinter  (babble)  @ 13:12, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * In a similar case, you should move the sandbox and then replace the redirect with an empty sandbox page. There wasn't a large sandbox type history so there wasn't a reason not to use that history.  If there was, it is usually best to ask an administrator to perform the move. Ryan Vesey  Review me!  13:20, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Just to mention that per this edit, the "where it came from" was mentioned in the history. I agree, a history merge would be a good idea, there's no need to "leave someone with a sandbox", as a new one can be created. Worm TT(talk ) 13:22, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks Ryan and Worm. It didn't occur to me to check the later editing history to see if anyone had said where it came from. I have now merged the sandbox history into the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Adventure: Request for feedback on Community Fellowship proposal
Hi! I'm contacting you because you have participated or discussed The Wikipedia Adventure learning tutorial/game idea. I think you should know about a current Community Fellowship proposal to create the game with some Wikimedia Foundation support. Your feedback on the proposal would be very much appreciated. I should note that the feedback is for the proposal, not the proposer, and even if the Fellowship goes forward it might be undertaken by presently not-mentioned editors. Thanks again for your consideration.

Proposal: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Fellowships/Project_Ideas/The_Wikipedia_Adventure

Cheers, User:Ocaasi 16:41, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Can't find message
Hello. I had a message on my talk page saying I had new messages from you on your talk page, but I can't find it!"Selene Scott (talk) 23:13, 28 July 2012 (UTC)"
 * Did you see [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/11#user_page this]? Timing is a little off, but it looks like that was the last time he replied to you here, anyway, according to the page history... I dunno; I'm just a random talkpage stalker. Sorry. I was just leaving. -— Isarra ༆ 04:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's right. It's been archived before you came to see. So - let's start your page.  Rcsprinter  (shout)  @ 11:03, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 12:39, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup 2012 July newsletter
We're approaching the beginning of 2012's final round. Pool A sees as the leader, with 300 points being awarded for the featured article Bivalvia, and Pool B sees  in the lead, with 10 good articles, and over 35 articles eligible for good topic points. Pool A sees in second place with a number of articles relating to baseball, while Pool B's  follows Grapple X, with a variety of contributions including the high-scoring, high-importance featured article on the 2010 film Pride & Prejudice. Ruby2010, like Grapple X, also claimed a number of good topic points; despite this, not a single point has been claimed for featured topics in the contest so far. The same is true for featured portals.

Currently, the eighth-place competitor (and so the lowest scorer who would reach the final round right now) has scored 332, more than double the 150 needed to reach the final round last year. In 2010, however, 430 was the lowest qualifying score. In this competition, we have generally seen scores closer to those in 2010 than those in 2011. Let's see what kind of benchmark we can set for future competitions! As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:31, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Questions about Wikipedia & SuggestBot
Hi, we’ve been running a research experiment with SuggestBot and would like to ask you some questions about Wikipedia and SuggestBot. You can find more information and the questions on this page. It should take less than ten minutes to respond. We would greatly appreciate if you had the time to participate! Regards, Nettrom (talk) 21:05, 27 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi, just stopping by with a one-time reminder that we would really like to hear from you! Cheers, Nettrom (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Clifton Down railway station
Hi, thanks for the promotion, but would you mind updating the review to reflect this? It ends at neutral currently. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, done.  Rcsprinter  (tell me stuff)  @ 11:55, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Your motd tools
Really cool. I wish i'd known about 'em earlier ;-) benzband  ( talk ) 21:23, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't really use them that much, how did you find out about them?  Rcsprinter  (chat)  @ 08:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I came across someone who was using them (i used to use Hi878's before they got deleted). While i'm here i might as well try to bribe you into reviewing some mottos.  benzband  ( talk ) 12:12, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
 * *Chomp chomp chomp*. Go on then, online bribes work far too well on me.  Rcsprinter  (babble)  @ 12:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Tea Leaf delivery
Hi Rcsprinter! I'm in the process of awaiting (I hope) approval to have access to User:EdwardsBot, so fingers crossed. But, in the mean time, can you still play messenger for me for The Tea Leaf issue 5? I do deeply appreciate it. The recipient list is here. THank you so much as always (and please double check that I closed the small text? Ha ha!!). SarahStierch (talk) 22:15, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
 * ✅ As an administrator, can't you add yourself to the list? I could do with access myself (or admin rights?) as it would help with some things. :)  Rcsprinter  (chat)  @ 08:41, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Solstice at Panipat, 14 January 1761
Hi. I reverted your close on the above AfD. Generally, an AfD should be closed a no consensus by a non-admin only if there has been little discussion and is non-contentious. --regentspark (comment) 15:27, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Your F3 deletion tagging
What are you thinking? None of these tags make sense; they're claims of fair use for the images in order to depict the works whose covers they are. You even tagged a public domain image as bad fair use! Nyttend (talk) 14:14, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I agree. Most of these images you have been tagging are mine. The logos are fair use under the copyright claimed. I would like to know why you are targeting these. --Morning277 (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm tagging them as no source, because none of them said where it was from. So either find a source for them or put the deletion tags back. Google Images is not acceptable as it only searches the web for the pictures, it did not create or own them.  Rcsprinter  (chat)  @ 11:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Why thank you very much. You too!  Rcsprinter  (deliver)  @ 10:01, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 10:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
SarahStierch (talk) 23:20, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

WP:PERM
When helping out in  admin areas please make more background checks on candidates - otherwise it just creates more work for the reviewing  admin. The generally required minimum for autopatrolled is 50 creations, and preferably notstubs, DAB pages or redirects. Created articles should be substantial, and free of issues. That said, we currently have serious backlogs at  WP:AFC and NPP, if you have time, please consider helping out there, it would be much  appreciated. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 02:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Inline Citations
Re the tag you added to my article Angela Paul re inline citations, the guidelines say they are required for “material that isd challenged or likely to be challenged”. My stub article only said that she participated in two Olympics with her placings and is unlikely to be challenged! My source “Black Gold” by respected author/journalist Ron Palenski has the subtitle “100 years of New Zealand at the Olympic Games – A statistical record. Hugo999 (talk) 11:48, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Alright, whatever. It was nothing personal to the article. (You might want to read WP:OWN).  Rcsprinter  (shout)  @ 11:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:54, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Derek's Talk Page
Please accept my apologies for my random interruption to your recent discussion. (See my own Talk Page for embarrassing details). Regards. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:51, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Image issue
Please see message you sent me regarding image:

File:The_Church_-_Metropolis_Australian_picture_sleeve.jpg

I added the link for Google images. My copy of the artwork says it is copyright by Arista Records. I'm not sure what else I am supposed to do.

Thanks.

Louis0918 (talk) 19:40, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
 * You have added the copyright, which is good, but that isn't what it is tagged for. It requires a link to the source and unfortunately Google Images doesn't count, because that only searches the web for the images but doesn't create or own them. If you can find the source and add a URL link, the tag can be removed.  Rcsprinter  (orate)  @ 08:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

OK. I think I understand now. I changed the source link. I hope this fixes the problem. Thank you.

Louis0918 (talk) 03:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Burnley Savings and Loans
Orlady (talk) 08:04, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Amaryllis (ship)
Orlady (talk) 16:02, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Again!
Hope you enjoyed your vacation. My other mentor, Pol, went out of the country in June, was due back in July and to my knowledge never came back. Can we do some work soon? Would be great to get my user page looking like I know what I'm doing around here! "Selene Scott (talk)" —Preceding undated comment added 04:53, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Your input is requested in Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HostBot 2
Thought you might be interested in weighing in on the invites v. welcomes thread? - J-Mo Talk to Me   Email Me  21:24, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 11:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

New Smithy
thank you for the barnstar. I found your page while fixing pages in Category:ParserFunction errors. I check all the new pages in that category about once every two days. if it looks like an obvious fix, then I try to fix it. some of the pages there are broken on purpose, but I try to fix those that are not. Frietjes (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
SarahStierch (talk) 06:14, 24 August 2012 (UTC)