User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/18

DYK for Heinz Baked Beanz
The DYK project (nominate) 08:03, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

My next adoption lesson
Did you forget about it or did you Just didnt get time for it? TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:19, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Incredibly sorry, again! I glanced at it once the other day and then completely forgot. I'm terribly busy of late, sorry if this sets a bad example but as I'm only a volunteer with no obligation it can't be helped. Test is up, then we can have the next lesson.  Rcsprinter  (rap)  @ 20:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Jack Taylor (basketball)
RCS, I was wondering what rationale you used when non-admin-closing Articles for deletion/Jack Taylor (basketball). From what I can tell, it doesn't look like a clear uncontroversial decision. — X96lee15 (talk) 13:53, 2 December 2012 (UTC)
 * As well as everybody (nearly) !voting keep, I found there were multiple good sources and it meets the notability guidelines, in my view. Although in your !vote you said it was a case of BLP1E, I think that even this college basketballer has something which should be included. If you disagree with the decision, open up another AfD.  Rcsprinter  (articulate)  @ 18:35, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 19:17, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Why did you flag metascan online ?
It is semilar to virus total Are you a google employee ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.180.88.70 (talk) 07:20, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I'm afraid I don't know what you're talking about. Would you mind being more specific and perhaps giving some links?  Rcsprinter  (gossip)  @ 17:03, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

My adoption exam
Finally got a chance to answer the questions. Please check the answers. Also, I am still waiting for feedback on the answers I messed up. (Have been asking since quite a time for those; Didnt get it yet :| ) TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:11, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * On your adoption page I have now marked the copyright test and put up the next lesson. In regards to your long-lingering question about what you didn't do quite right: first of all: don't worry about it.. But, if you insist, here follows a detailed analysis of your messings up.
 * On Five Pillars Q5, I asked you about reliable sources. And Facebook is absolutely not a reliable source. It will be promotional in every way, and is never acceptable as a reference. So when you answered with an "OK but apart from the controversy part", that wasn't really right. Just an absolute no-no, any social network, or indeed, non-proper or non-self-published website. Have you read our policy on reliable sources?
 * That was pretty much all. Your other answers on the first test were fine.  Rcsprinter  (talkin' to me?)  @ 20:38, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks TheOriginalSoni (talk) 20:49, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Koro (medicine)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Koro (medicine). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:15, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Unilateral change to T:TDYK undone
Rcsprinter123, I have just reversed your unilateral removal of "Template:" from the templates on the T:TDYK page, including the boilerplate up top and the daily headers. Those were there for a very good reason, and you should have inquired on WT:DYK before removing them, starting with you "what's the point of Template?" edit summary on December 8. The point is that this is how people are instructed to enter their newly created nomination templates on the T:TDYK nominations page: with "Template:" as part of the entry.

If you have any questions or disagreements, please take them to the DYK talk page, where the matter can be discussed in detail. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm all for consistency, but it doesn't even make a difference besides lowering the amount of text on the page (a good thing™). It's like the difference between using Ignore all rules and Ignore all rules. One is shorter, the other isn't. They both do effectively the same thing. Rcsprinter123 was just being BOLD and shorting the page text. Legoktm (talk) 05:32, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * FYI: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know. Legoktm (talk) 05:50, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The point is it's confusing for new DYK contributors if none of the existing entries look like the instructions on the created template page (not T:TDYK) say they're supposed to look. I remember being caught by that back when I started. It's not like the extra "text" is a real length problem editing this page, since most people go to the date they want and just edit from there. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:10, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 20:27, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Greek government-debt crisis countermeasures
Hello! Your submission of Greek government-debt crisis countermeasures at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Maile (talk) 23:19, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
~Super Hamster  Talk Contribs 05:25, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

New York City Subway in popular culture
I've had to reverse your NAC of New York City Subway in popular culture. Please review the criteria for "Speedy Keep" before applying it to discussions again.&mdash;Kww(talk) 15:40, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * ...there were lots of people saying keep. The nomination was incorrect. What was wrong with my speedy closure?  Rcsprinter  (chat)  No, I'm Santa Claus! @ 18:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sure, there were lots of people saying "keep", but the rules of "speedy keep" are quite explicit in that the nominator must not have advanced an argument for deletion, withdrawn the nomination, the nomination being unquestionably vandalism or disruption, the nominator having been banned, the page being a policy or guideline page, or currently linked from the Main Page. None of those were applicable. I agree that the nominator had a shaky deletion argument (quoting the MOS page about trivia lists instead of WP:NOT's dictate against indiscriminate information), but that's a form problem. You can have unanimous "keep" vote, hundreds of voters long, and not qualify for a "speedy" keep. "Snow keep", perhaps, but it's hard to justify one of those after only a day.&mdash;Kww(talk) 21:08, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Richard Nixon talk page notice
I have added a section on the talk page for the article Richard Nixon titled "Section deleted on 13 December 2012." Please share your thoughts on the talk page. Thanks. Mitchumch (talk) 17:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Opportunity declined. Don't see what I have to do with it.  Rcsprinter  (post)  No, I'm Santa Claus! @ 18:10, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Insult
I think for someone who goes in for such cheap insults like that wouldn't be such a terrible editor. No other person has that put ahead of their other offices, why are you arbitrarily making an exception here? There is no reason. So you might have been around for longer than three weeks, but you obviously haven't got a clue. Think about that before you engage in personal attacks again. Paleohelper (talk), 18:00, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry if you took that as a personal attack, but that's a currently held office, so it would logically go higher up.  Rcsprinter  (post)  No, I'm Santa Claus! @ 20:34, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Moving my comment at the LGBT list RfC
As a veteran editor, you should know that moving or editing other people's comments without notice is seen as extremely bad form. Your edit in particular completely changed the meaning of my comment, since its referent ("that line of reasoning") after your move was pointing to another different unrelated comment. My comment is not intended as a "general comment" about the topic, it's a very direct statement about your stated reasons to start the talk. In any case, if you expected the page structure to follow certain conventions, you should state them explicitly instead of going moving other people's comments without first asking. Diego (talk) 23:57, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:46, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Finite-difference time-domain method
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Finite-difference time-domain method. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:17, 25 December 2012 (UTC)