User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/21

My adoption
Answered the questions. Please check. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 06:20, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry..! I have now.  Rcsprinter  (post)  @ 14:17, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * And again. (Do I have to remind after every time!? :)) Do post the questions too TheOriginalSoni (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm very sorry, but I'll get to you when I can. Please bear with me.  Rcsprinter  (natter)  @ 20:18, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Trent Barton bus routes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Trent Barton bus routes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Trent Barton bus routes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Charles (talk) 18:55, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 17:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

SFall34 and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Community Professional Loudspeakers
Hi Rcsprinter123. I notice that you declined [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Professional_Loudspeakers&diff=prev&oldid=531470132 this AfC]. It looks like the user who wrote the page, contacted you twice on your user talk page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rcsprinter123&diff=prev&oldid=531899168] and [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rcsprinter123&diff=prev&oldid=531899168]. You did not reply to either of these messages, though you would have seen them since you edited your talk page before they were archived. This isn't a very good experience for new users, AfC is supposed to provide help, not a bar to pass (they could simply post the article themselves, if they wanted). If you aren't going to be able to give feedback to users needing help, I suggest staying away from reviewing AfCs. Prodego talk  05:12, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

My adoption page (AK)
✅ Please review my answers and sorry to keep you waiting. Arctic  Kangaroo  11:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I've seen the answers and put the next lesson up there. You can find my comments by expanding the green dropdown box.  Rcsprinter  (talk)  @ 20:22, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 January newsletter
Signups are now closed; we have our final 127 contestants for this year's competition. 64 contestants will make it to the next round at the end of February, but we're already seeing strong scoring compared to previous years. currently leads, with 358 points. At this stage in 2012, the leader had 342 points, while in 2011, the leader had 228 points. We also have a large number of scorers when compared with this stage in previous years. was the first competitor to score this year, as he was last year, with a detailed good article review. Some other firsts:
 * was also the first to score for an article, with the good article Hurricane Gordon (2000). Again, this is a repeat of last year!
 * was the first to score for a did you know, with Marquis Flowers.
 * was the first to score for an in the news, with 2013 Houphouët-Boigny stampede.
 * was the first to score for a featured list, with list of Billboard Social 50 number-one artists.
 * was the first to score for a featured picture, with File:Thure de Thulstrup - L. Prang and Co. - Battle of Gettysburg - Restoration by Adam Cuerden.jpg.

Featured articles, portals and topics, as well as good topics, are yet to feature in the competition.

This year, the bonus points system has been reworked, with bonus points on offer for old articles prepared for did you know, and "multiplier" points reworked to become more linear. For details, please see WikiCup/Scoring. There have been some teething problems as the bot has worked its way around the new system, but issues should mostly be ironed out- please report any problems to the WikiCup talk page. Here are some participants worthy of note with regards to the bonus points:


 * was the first to score bonus points, with Portland-class cruiser, a good article.
 * has the highest overall bonus points, as well as the highest scoring article, thanks to his work on Enrico Fermi, now a good article. The biography of such a significant figure to the history of science warrants nearly five times the normal score.
 * claimed bonus points for René Vautier and Nicolas de Fer, articles that did not exist on the English Wikipedia at the start of the year; a first for the WikiCup. The articles were eligible for bonus points because of fact they were both covered on a number of other Wikipedias.

Also, a quick mention of, who may well have already written the oddest article of the WikiCup this year: did you know that the Fucking mayor objected to Fucking Hell on the grounds that there was no Fucking brewery? The gauntlet has been thrown down; can anyone beat it?

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:29, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Charles Spalding
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Adoption
✅ I have also anseered a qn in Five Pillars. Arctic  Kangaroo  14:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool, I've added the test to your page.  Rcsprinter  (constabulary)  @ 16:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of pantheists
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of pantheists. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

The Tea Leaf - Issue Seven
Hello again! We have some neat updates about the Teahouse:
 * We’ve added badges! Teahouse awards is a pilot project to learn how acknowledgement impacts engagement and retention in Teahouse and Wikipedia.


 * We’ve got a new WikiLove Badge script that makes giving badges quick and easy. Add it here.  You can give out badges to thank helpful hosts, welcome guests, acknowledge great questions and more.


 * Come join the experiment and let us know what you think!


 * And...for all of your great work and all of the progress that you've helped the Teahouse make, we hereby award you the Host Badge:


 * You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here

Thanks again! Ocaasi 01:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Comment needed
We need your comment at Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Bugs. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:57, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata is here; please disable any interwiki bots on the English Wikipedia
Hi!

Wikidata has been deployed to the English Wikipedia. Going forward, Wikidata will manage interwiki links. Further information: Wikidata/Deployment Questions and .

Important note: Bots that continue to add, remove, or update interwiki links on the English Wikipedia may be blocked from editing after Saturday, February 16, 2013.

If you are running pywikipedia's interwiki.py, please update to 11073 which will automatically prevent your bot from updating links on this wiki.

If you have any questions, please ask at the bot owners' noticeboard. Thank you for your past work maintaining interwiki links. It has been very appreciated and we're looking forward to an even brighter future with Wikidata. Legoktm (talk) 10:17, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Seriously?
You can't be serious in thinking that somebody "accidentally" deleted the whole page and then pressed Save page. – TC N7  JM  21:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Don't be so narrow-minded; it's entirely possible. Don't you remember being new when everything was so difficult and imposing?  Rcsprinter  (warn)  @ 21:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, but I didn't have the audacity to press Save page after deleting the whole page! – TC N7  JM  21:56, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, don't take it out on me. At least I delivered a personal message to the user instead of a template. And to keep the atmosphere from turning frosty, I still need to thank you for your work against the vandalism. Stuff that needs to be done! :)  Rcsprinter  (lecture)  @ 21:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Adoption
Hello? I am still waiting for my final adoption exam! TheOriginalSoni (talk) 12:16, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you reminded me by posting the TAFI thing. Promise I'll do it today.  Rcsprinter  (orate)  @ 12:18, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Have posted a question there. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 18:39, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Adoption: AK
✅ Arctic   Kangaroo  10:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 17:53, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Paris Ouest
Hi, I saw you closed Articles for deletion/Paris Ouest. Perhaps I expressed my request too mildly, so that it did not attract much comments, but this article should really be deleted, as it essentially refers to a non-existing concept (check Google scholar, references to "Paris Ouest" are about completely different things). It there a way to reactivate the request ? --Superzoulou (talk) 19:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I can't undo the close because there's been 3 relists with no discussion, but if you want to nominate it again, follow the procedure or if its too complicated to do manually, install twinkle and do it that way (easier). A fresh nomination could spur debate.  Rcsprinter  (chatter)  @ 21:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:21, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Perfection
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Perfection. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 18:15, 23 February 2013 (UTC)