User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/43

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

1842
Hi, what's your source for 1842 (wrt Broadbottom Viaduct)? Biddle has it as 1845. Btw, I came across this NHLE entry, which is supposed to be about Broadbottom but the grid reference and description are about Dinting. I though you might find it useful if you wanted to expand the latter a bit. Also, some of the detail in the Broadbottom article might be useful in the Dinting article—the two seem to have quite an intertwined history. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  20:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * My source for 1842 is one I used in the Dinting article,, specifically the part that says "Broadbottom station had opened on 10/12/1842 and the contract for the Etherow viaduct immediately east of the station was let in early 1842 with construction commencing on 5th March of that year. The viaduct was opened to traffic on 24th December 1842, a fantastic achievement." (Emphasis added.)
 * I'll see about expanding Dinting in a while, but it's the night before the working week.  Rcsprinter123    (spout)  @ 20:56, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Dinting Viaduct
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ebola virus epidemic in West Africa. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:48, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Murray (journalist)
Are you sure Articles for deletion/Peter Murray (journalist) is suitable for non-admin closure, or a 'keep' decision? With one !vote for and one against, it's not clear at all. There's no consensus that presidents of trade unions are automatically notable. Sionk (talk) 21:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I can see that, but it's been 14 days since that keep !vote and nobody has challenged it. Maybe it should've been no consensus, but that's still a keep.  Rcsprinter123    (banter)  @ 21:29, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I'd accept 'no consensus', but that's clearly not a 'keep' decision (and not a non admin decision either). Perhaps an admin should close it. Sionk (talk) 00:55, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Deletion review for Peter Murray (journalist)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Peter Murray (journalist). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Sionk (talk) 17:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!


Happy Halloween!

Hello Rcsprinter123: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –  NorthAmerica1000 06:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Jackmcbarn RfA question


Lixxx235! has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

One thing: would you consider rewording the RfA optional question for Jackmcbarn? Linking to WP:HERE(in other words, WP:NOTHERE kind of sounds insulting to me considering the context; mainspace contributions are certainly not the only way to contribute to Wikipedia.(WP:NOTNOTHERE Cheers! Cheers, Thanks,  L235 - Talk Ping when replying 21:09, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I made a slight clarification, but I'm not sure how I can say what I'm trying to in other words.  Rcsprinter123    (natter)  @ 21:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I feel removing the link to WP:HERE would help a lot, and ask what his best contribs in a general sense are maybe? I'm not sure, the link to WP:NOTHERE just seems a bit insulting. Cheers, Thanks,  L235 - Talk Ping when replying 21:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Artificial intelligence
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Artificial intelligence. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 October 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi
Apparently according to another user there are already a bot doing the Onthisday tagging. But I have not noticed that it adds the actual tag. I might be wrong but.. I leave it for now :). Thanks again for your assistance.--BabbaQ (talk) 13:32, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2014: The results
The 2014 WikiCup champion is, who flew the flag of the Smithsonian Institution. This was Godot13's first WikiCup competition and, over the 10 months of the competition, he has produced (among other contributions) two featured lists and an incredible 292 featured pictures, including architectural photographs and scans of historical documents. , 2012 and 2013 WikiCup champion, came in second, having written a large number of biology-related articles. , WikiCup finalist every year since 2010, finished in third.

A full list of our prize-winners follows:


 * wins the prize for first place and the FP prize for 181 featured pictures in the final round.
 * wins the prize for second place and the DYK prize for 65 did you knows in the final round.
 * wins the prize for third place and the FA prize for four featured articles in the final round.
 * wins the prize for fourth place
 * wins a final 8 prize.
 * wins a final 8 prize.
 * wins a final 8 prize.
 * wins the GA prize for 27 good articles in round 2 and the review prize for 28 good article reviews in round 1.
 * wins the FL prize for three featured lists in round 2.
 * wins the FPo prize his work on featured portals.
 * wins the topic prize for a nine-article featured topic in round 3.
 * wins the news prize for 28 in the news articles in round 3.

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have participated this year. We warmly invite all of you to sign up for next year's competition. Discussions and polls concerning potential rules changes are also open, and all are welcome to participate. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. and 22:52, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

James Nachtwey and WikiProject Transport?
What's the connection, can you explain? You seem to think there is one. Palosirkka (talk) 18:32, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The banner I rated there was for the Maritime transport task force, a subproject of Wikiproject Transport. This banner was added by in 2007. I'm not sure of the connection. You can remove it if you want to.

 Rcsprinter123    (drawl)  @ 19:09, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the prompt reply. Unfortunately looks like user Haus is no longer with us so I brought the matter up on the talk page of Nachtwey. Take care! Palosirkka (talk) 10:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Relisting
Hello again, as far I remember, I have told you about relisting few weeks ago but I repeat in case you forgot. You have relisted an AfD for a third time. According to WP:Relist, a second relist is enough in normal cases. Note, a relist is not a substitute of "no consensus". In rare controversial cases a third relist is possible, but one has to provide a relisting comment i.e. reason for relisting for a third time. Anyway, I hope all is well with you. Have a nice day!  Jim Car ter  20:07, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Jim Cartar: I assume you are referring to Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Eisenach. I only relisted because it was a very old discussion with no clear direction established. If there had been proper arguments to keep or delete, a no consensus close would've been my choice, but I wanted to give people more time to comment.  Rcsprinter123    (notify)  @ 00:23, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-46
 Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * You may see a new tool on the mobile site of the English Wikipedia. It asks simple questions to make the article better. In the future, your answers will go to Wikidata.
 * The MediaWiki API now shows information in a nice format. You can translate it in translatewiki.net.

File information cleanup
 * Reminder: You can help fix file information on your wiki. It will help robots understand the information. After that, it will be easier for you to search files and re-use them.
 * You can join two IRC chats this week to learn more about the file cleanup project. One will be on Wednesday at 18:00 (UTC) and the other on Thursday at 04:00 (UTC). You can ask questions during the chat if you need help to fix files on your wiki.
 * You can see a list of files to fix on the Labs tool. You can report bugs and ask questions on the talk page.

Problems
 * Wikimedia Labs was broken for a few hours on Thursday. It was due to a hardware problem.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki ( 1.25wmf7 ) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 5. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 11, and on all Wikipedias from November 12 (calendar).
 * You can now use more editing tools for tables in VisualEditor. You can add rows and columns, merge cells, and edit table captions.
 * The style and insert menus in the toolbar of VisualEditor now show fewer tools. This helps you see the most common tasks. You can see all items by clicking "More".
 * The way windows inside VisualEditor work has changed. VisualEditor should be faster and have fewer bugs.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.  15:00, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Vagina
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Vagina. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you

 * Oh, thanks!  Rcsprinter123    (lecture)  @ 09:48, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Question
Do you think it is possible to give some Bot the task of filling in broken Disambiguation Links, right now no Bot seems to be doing this. Let me know :)--BabbaQ (talk) 23:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, you're not entirely clear in what you mean by fixing these links. Could you link to a diff of what you think needs to be done?  Rcsprinter123    (jive)  @ 09:47, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * For example if we say SVT it should be SVT. There are currently no Bot filling in missing disam links on articles. I think it would be helpful.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:23, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The problem that I think you're talking about is already handled by the people at WP:DPL. How could a bot know which page to link to?  Rcsprinter123    (indicate)  @ 00:36, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
 * How could a Bot know which articles appears on DYK? :) Could that be done I presumed that a similar thing could be done with this matter. Anyhow no one is currently taking care of it at WP:DPL it is quite apparent. Anyway, I atleast asked and if nothing can be done, nothing can be done :) Cheers.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 November 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-47
 Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki ( 1.25wmf8 ) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 12. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 18, and on all Wikipedias from November 19 (calendar).
 * The new search tool ("CirrusSearch") will be on the English Wikipedia from November 19.

Move from Bugzilla to Phabricator
 * The tool to track bugs will change on November 21.
 * You won't be able to add or edit bugs between November 21 and November 24.
 * You can make the change easier for you by creating your account.
 * Bugzilla will be frozen after the change. You will see, edit and report bugs in Phabricator.
 * You can join two IRC chats to learn more about the change. The chats will be on Tuesday, November 18 at 16:00 (UTC) and 23:00 UTC.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.  18:28, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright checks when performing AfC reviews
Hello. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular. The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered. If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.) If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with. Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors. I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC). Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Jasper Steverlinck album
This was not an appropriate close for a non-admin. There is clearly no consensus to blank a No.1 album. Please unclose and revert edits. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:10, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Done. Sorry.  Rcsprinter123    (discuss)  @ 22:29, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * That's okay, thanks... it was a very strange AfD, both in the starting and in comparison to 1000s of less notable and unsourced albums in the category. Being a Belgian singer notwithstanding. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Pen clicking (2nd nomination)
Hi RCS, when you closed the above AfD you forgot to take the AfD header off the article and put an OldAfDMulti tag on the article talkpage (it's done now). I was a little surprised to see that one get closed by a non-admin actually, it was a bit of a tricky one. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 05:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Would you have any suggestions?
A few months ago during the eventually unsuccessful Requests_for_adminship/Piotrus_3 you voted "neutral". I wonder if you'd like to discuss any concerns of yours, or if you would have any suggestions in the event I'd decide to run again (which I am not planning to do anytime soon, but might consider in the future). For a better sense of my work and activities around the project, I invite you to consider reviewing my userpage, my talk page archives (which are not redacted), to watchlist my talk page, or use edit analysis tools like Wikichecker, content.paragr, dewkin, xtools-pages or xtools-ec (which in theory should work as of late 2014...). I understand your concerns about canvassing, and I hope I understand that policy better now - I would be more than happy to chat about it if you'd like to query me on it now. I also do wonder about your comment "having to run for RfA three times...". Would this mean that you would have a policy of not supporting any candidacy that goes up for consideration if the candidate was unsuccessful two or more times before? Thank you for your time, (PS. If you reply here, I'd appreciate a WP:ECHO or talkback ping). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-48
 Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes
 * The move from Bugzilla to Phabricator is done. You can now report bugs in Phabricator.

Problems
 * There was a problem when editing tables in VisualEditor. VisualEditor was trying to fix bad values for the  or   option. VisualEditor now leaves the bad values to avoid making things worse. This was fixed on November 17.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki ( 1.25wmf9 ) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since November 19. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from November 25, and on all Wikipedias from November 26 (calendar).
 * You will be able to try VisualEditor on many new wikis for the first time. After November 26, VisualEditor will become available on Wikidata, Wikiquote, Wikibooks, Wikiversity, Wikivoyage, and Wikinews wikis. You can find it in your Beta options.
 * VisualEditor now tells you if your edit needs to be approved.
 * You can now use VisualEditor's tools directly when you resume editing after closing the save window.
 * VisualEditor's table editing tools now work better in right-to-left languages.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.  19:31, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 November 2014

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:21, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 December 2014
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:31, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 is just around the corner...
Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup.


 * We would like to announce that Josh (J Milburn) and Ed (The ed17), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out.
 * In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (Sturmvogel 66) and Christine (Figureskatingfan), who are joining Brian (Miyagawa) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the GA Cup, which she now co-runs.
 * The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk), The ed17 (talk), Miyagawa (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:54, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-50
<section begin="technews-2014-W50"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * All users are now getting pages from servers that run the HHVM tool. HHVM should make pages load faster.
 * You can join a video chat about Phabricator on December 11 at 18:00 (UTC). Phabricator is the new tool to report issues.

Problems
 * There was a problem with Phabricator on November 29. It was due to a network issue.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki ( 1.25wmf11 ) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since December 3. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from December 9. It will be on all Wikipedias from December 10 (calendar).
 * You can now exit VisualEditor by pressing the "Esc" key.
 * It is now easier to use VisualEditor with IMEs. Typing in Malayalam now works better.
 * The new version of OOjs UI fixed many issues with the size and layout of buttons in dialogs.
 * (Lua) You can no longer use  to get the HTML from special page transclusion. You can see a list of scripts to fix.

Future changes
 * Starting next week JavaScript tools won't work if they use jQuery Migrate.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2014-W50"/> 17:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 December 2014
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:50, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-51
<section begin="technews-2014-W51"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * You may see a new tool tested on the mobile site of the English Wikipedia. It asks simple questions to make the article better. In the future, your answers will go to Wikidata.
 * You can watch a video to learn how to use Phabricator to manage projects.
 * You can test a new version of the Content Translation tool.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki ( 1.25wmf12 ) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since December 10. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from December 16. It will be on all Wikipedias from December 17 (calendar).
 * You can now find and replace text in VisualEditor. You can open the tool via the menu,  or.
 * VisualEditor now doesn't change the space at the end of a text that you make bold.
 * The "Apply changes" button in the reference window of VisualEditor is now disabled until you make a change.

Future changes
 * The star image of the watchlist may change soon.
 * You won't be able to use Phabricator on December 18, 2014. It will be down between 00:00 and 08:00 (UTC).

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2014-W51"/> 16:44, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:SupremeSAT(Pvt.)
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:SupremeSAT(Pvt.). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2014
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-52
<section begin="technews-2014-W52"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * The Technical Operations team is now using Phabricator to track their tasks. The Operations team manages the Wikimedia servers. In the future you will be able to see the tasks that are not private.

Software changes this week
 * There will be no software changes this week and next week. This is because of the end-of-year holidays. The next update of MediaWiki will be on January 6.

Future changes
 * The system that displays citations will change in the future. The new system will not change the style of citations.
 * A new design for VisualEditor will come in January. You can try it now on test wikis.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2014-W52"/> 16:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014

 * —MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2014
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Strange thing on AfD
Hi! I was looking at Articles for deletion/Waterfront Elementary School and saw a note that it was included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions, but when I went to the list, it was not there. Thanks for all your efforts! Jacona (talk) 13:59, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
 * That's unusual; I suppose that when deletion sorting I must have closed the AfD before my delsort script had had time to add it to the list. I've now added it to the Schools list. Thanks for pointing this out!  Rcsprinter123    (push)  @ 14:03, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry
For some reason I was looking at this version of the page (before the 3 was added). G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 13:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-01
<section begin="technews-2015-W01"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Software changes
 * There are no technical changes this week.

Feedback about Tech News in 2014
 * The writers of the technical newsletter are asking for your opinion. Did you get the information you wanted this year? Did we miss important technical news in 2014? What kind of information was too late? Please tell us at m:Talk:Tech/News. You can write in your language. Thank you!

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2015-W01"/> 16:52, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

Cartography and copyright
Hi there fellow cartographer. So, I was looking at one of the maps you made and I noticed that you did not provide attribution for your data layers. Where did they come from and what is the copyright status of them? -- Guerillero &#124;  My Talk  20:19, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Guerillero: Those maps are sourced from U.S. Census Bureau data, which as a work of the U.S. federal government, is in the public domain. This means I can use it to make other graphics from, and upload them on Commons. I should get round to adding a source, but that isn't a requirement especially as none of the original map appears in the image.  Rcsprinter123    (discuss)  @ 20:53, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * While legally that is true, the best practice is to cite your sources. This is because there is creativity in the data itself. When I digitize, I make judgment calls over edge cases that another person on my team might make in the other direction. -- Guerillero  &#124;  My Talk  21:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I provided a source on this image; would that format do for all future uploads?  Rcsprinter123    (utter)  @ 21:41, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

WP:Co-op
Hey Rcsprinter (admission of shame: After reviewing your userpage, I have been pronouncing your name wrong this whole time...so sorry!) I wanted to ask if you might be interested in mentoring one or more editors during our pilot of the mentorship space called the Co-op. We plan to run the pilot in late January for about one month. The idea is that mentors will be doing one-on-one teaching based on how an editor wants to contribute, and it's not some huge commitment to teach/learn comprehensively about Wikipedia. We also want to make to easier for new editors to find mentors as well. Your experience adopting editors already will definitely be useful for new editors just getting started. If you're interested, please sign up here and feel free to peruse, make suggestions, or ask questions about how the Co-op will work. Thanks a bunch (and Happy New Year!) <font color="green" face="Candara">I, JethroBT drop me a line 06:10, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you for your words, and this barnstar. I will be continuing to edit as I have, and won't let this RfA put me off doing anything.  Rcsprinter123    (interact)  @ 16:59, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you for the barnstar.  Rcsprinter123    (say)  @ 20:33, 30 December 2014 (UTC)

Is there any way that entry in b-log can be redacted ? We will have clueless folks in any future rfas too, and that entry will always be creating an unfair disadvantage for you. It is clear that lots of folks cannot read the unblock message on their own.OrangesRyellow (talk) 02:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Block logs can be redacted, it is very rarely done - only in extreme circumstances. In this situation, hiding the past is not best solution - because there will always be people who are able to see what is hidden and will ask more questions. Better would be for Rcsprinter to be open that he made a mistake and be upfront about it in the next RfA. Remember Wikipedia favours transparency. <span style='text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD; color:#000;'>Worm TT(<font color='#060'>talk ) 08:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Pardon me for not being very clear. I don't want that his whole block log be redacted. I only want one block, which was undone saying that that block should not be held against him. People still seemed to be holding it against him, voting on that basis, and questioning him on that again. He has been found innocent for that. And it is obvious that even though innocent, some folks will continue to vote against him despite him being innocent because the voter did not bother to read the unclock rationale, and apparently caused an irreversible pile-on. I want to avoid a repeat of this. That is why I feel that part of the block log should be redacted. Regards.OrangesRyellow (talk) 08:49, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * I don't know whether "innocent" is exactly the right word there, because although I didn't do exactly what was stated in Philippe's block, I did make a few big mistakes that day that shouldn't have happened.  Rcsprinter123    (soliloquize)  @ 08:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Indeed. I remember leaping into action at the time. I too wouldn't say innocent, but nor would I say guilty. I'd say he made a mistake - there's no crime in that, but accepting your mistakes and learning from them is a great asset to have. Hiding them away is not. <span style='text-shadow:0 -1px #DDD,1px 0 #DDD,0 1px #DDD,-1px 0 #DDD; color:#000;'>Worm TT(<font color='#060'>talk ) 08:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)


 * I am not familiar with the incident. I had interpreted "should not be held against" as "innocent". However, if it was a "mistake" without being "innocent" or "guilty" either, I can understand why the entry should remain. However, I still remain with a feeling that it will create more than a due disadvantage because the nature of the block message is such that many people will not bother reading the unblock message. So, it is either a choice between having more disadvantage than is due, or creating more advantage than is due. I am in a quandary about which is more proper, and will leave it at this. Thanks for the attention and explanations. Regards.OrangesRyellow (talk) 09:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Sorry I missed...
your adminship bid. I would have supported (although it probably would not have affected the outcome). bd2412 T 17:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh, thanks for letting me know. It's always still nice to be aware of another support vote.  Rcsprinter123    (chinwag)  @ 18:31, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Euclidean algorithm
You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Euclidean algorithm. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Have a bacon-filled new year!
As a member of WikiProject Bacon, I'm wishing you a very happy New Year's Eve and a great 2015! May your new year be filled with positive experiences, great wiki contributions, and of course, well-smoked thin-cut bacon. ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 01:38, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year Rcsprinter123!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Rcsprinter123, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. NorthAmerica1000 10:45, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages. Sent using mass message sender. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from User:Northamerica1000/Mailing list.

WikiCup 2015 launch newsletter
Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name here. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised here.

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! , and

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:51, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 December 2014
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:10, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Interview
Behalf of WP India, we are interested to publish a special interview on Signpost. We means Sitush sir, Vishnu-ji, me etc. Let me know if you can manage it. Regards. -- Tito ☸ Dutta 20:40, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Titodutta: By WP India, I assume you are referring to WikiProject India. It would be fine to feature it, as the last appearance from WikiProject India was in 2011. What exactly do you mean by "special" interview? I would be interested in looking at any prior discussion about this, too. But I can manage it in the next few weeks.  Rcsprinter123    (indicate)  @ 23:35, 4 January 2015 (UTC)


 * I meant issues and problems faced by WP India. And as you have mentioned about 2011, please note, we had our national conference just in Cot (2014), after 2011 it happened in 2014, please see WikiProject_India/Condensed_proposed_roadmap_for_Wikimedia_work_in_India. It'll be nice to talk to the guys. Plus a followup of the roadmap was done in a recent event, we may mention that too. If you mention format and length, I'll take interview supply you content (for this ICC 2014). -- Tito ☸ Dutta 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

A cookie for you!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Lixxx235 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

--L235 (talk) Ping when replying 12:55, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

Trash Bag Bunch
I could use a hand with some edit warning going on with the Trash Bag Bunch article. You closed the AFD on this Nov 22 as redirect. The article's creator has reverted that edit twice restoring the article claiming that concensus was to keep. I've restored your redirect twice but this editor (the article's creator) insists otherwise. I've l left a note on the editor's talk page suggesting they open a new AFD if they disagree with the outcome, and would appreciate it you could share your thoughts there as well.--RadioFan (talk) 03:39, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added a supportive comment on the editor's talk page, although I noted that Deletion review would be a better place for a new discussion since the user does not want the article deleted.  Rcsprinter123    (warn)  @ 15:53, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 07 January 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2015-01-14/WikiProject report
I see you've moved the interview page to Wikipedia Signpost/2015-01-14/WikiProject report. I apologize for leaving a thank you note in the "Anything else you'd like to add?" section. One more thing, did you intend to leave in NE Ent's comment? If you did, that's fine I guess, but I didn't know whether it was a mistake or not. -- Amaryllis Gardener  talk 02:07, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * AmaryllisGardener: Sorry I may have been a little brutal in my trimming, but your thank you note did not have awfully much to do with AfC, which was the focus of the question. I was just thinking of saving space on the page. I can add it back if you would like.
 * As for NE Ent, they are entitled to their opinion even though it is quite abolitionist. After all, interviews are for opinions.  Rcsprinter123    (relate)  @ 12:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-03
<section begin="technews-2015-W03"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * Rotated PDF files in landscape format used to show too small. They will now display correctly. You may need to purge older files.
 * You can now use the  magic word instead of Template:!. Many wikis used the template to create a pipe  in tables and templates. You can delete the template.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki ( 1.25wmf14 ) has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since January 7. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from January 13. It will be on all Wikipedias from January 14 (calendar).
 * A bug in VisualEditor sometimes added a  (Sun) character. This is now fixed.
 * The search and replace tool in VisualEditor is now much faster in long pages.
 * The TemplateData editor now uses the same design as VisualEditor.
 * The  option is now shown in your language in the help of the classic editor toolbar.

Future changes
 * You can sign up to answer questions from designers. It will help them make editing easier.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2015-W03"/> 16:47, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:27, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traditional Chinese medicine. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-04
<section begin="technews-2015-W04"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent changes
 * You can download the new version of the Wikipedia app for Android. The new version shows lead images, better galleries and content from Wikidata. It also has many other new features.
 * Programs and bots still can't read information about images on many wikis. You can see the list of wikis with the most files to fix. Wikipedia in Italian, Indonesian and Japanese language have the most files to fix. On the biggest wikis you should use bots. Bots can add information templates to groups of files. You can ask other tech users to help you.

Problems
 * All JavaScript on Commons was broken for a few minutes on Tuesday. It was because of old code in the HotCat tool. The same problem happened on some Wikipedias on Wednesday. It is now fixed.

Software changes this week
 * There are no software changes this week and next week due to annual meetings.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2015-W04"/> 18:13, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks very much, Winner 42. And to think I was once topic banned from GA for being an incompetent reviewer. I guess it's a significant article to promote, too, so it's good that it was up to scratch.  Rcsprinter123    (articulate)  @ 17:13, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes Rcsprinter123 thank you for your extensive review of the United States. I was very impressed by your work from the beginning. Speaking of your topic ban, "If you're trying to achieve, there will be roadblocks. I've had them; everybody has had them. But obstacles don't have to stop you. If you run into a wall, don't turn around and give up. Figure out how to climb it, go through it, or work around it."- Michael Jordan — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChamithN (talk • contribs)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

NAC undo
Hi Rcsprinter, just a notification that I altered your non-admin closure of Trash Bag Bunch from redirect to keep because I believe the consensus is much more strongly in favour of keeping the article. Thanks, Sam Walton (talk) 21:43, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, that's fine.  Rcsprinter123    (spout)  @ 09:19, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Rcsprinter123/xtwa
your first DYK top icon template has duplicate args. looks like two top icon templates were spliced together. Frietjes (talk) 16:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Frietjes: I just removed them all; they were all outdated anyway.  Rcsprinter123    (banter)  @ 17:23, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-05
<section begin="technews-2015-W05"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * You can now translate articles with the new ContentTranslation tool on several wikis.

This week
 * There are no software changes this week due to annual meetings.

Future changes
 * You can join a project to improve WikiProjects.
 * The Compact Personal Bar will be removed for now. It has a bug that breaks the tool to choose your language. It will come back when the bug is fixed.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2015-W05"/> 16:08, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi Rcsprinter
What a amazing state this one that why few of my articles was removed causelessly? But, I think that was not hampering article  when it is added below of or at the separate title. Please, wanna request you to view back or again it whether it is good to reinstate or not.Thanks.mahendra — Preceding undated comment added 11:18, 29 January 2015
 * Mahendra Niraula: I don't exactly understand what your question is. Is there something I can do for you, specifically?  Rcsprinter123    (gas)  @ 11:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 January 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Creation–evolution controversy
Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation–evolution controversy. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-06
<section begin="technews-2015-W06"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Problems
 * There was a security issue on Wikimedia Labs. Many Labs tools were down after the issue was fixed.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since January 14. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from February 3. It will be on all Wikipedias from February 4 (calendar).
 * The "Save page" button in the VisualEditor toolbar is now blue rather than green. This is the same as on the mobile site.
 * You can now edit pages on the draft namespace with VisualEditor on the Russian Wikipedia and Hebrew Wikipedia. You can ask to get VisualEditor for a namespace on your wiki. When your community agrees, ask in Phabricator.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2015-W06"/> 16:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for United States
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:03, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Inzell
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/A. G. Cook (Musician)
Hey, do you know what's going on with A. G. Cook? The AfD was closed as no consensus, but the message template didn't get removed from the article. I can't tell if it needs to be redirected. hinnk (talk) 04:08, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Apologies, the automated closing script must've missed off removing the tag. I've taken it out now, and the article does not need to be redirected or anything.  Rcsprinter123    (tell)  @ 15:43, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! hinnk (talk) 04:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Closing "no quorum" AfDs
Hello, there is a discussion that may interest you at Wikipedia talk:Deletion process. As you have recently closed some AfDs of this type, you would be welcome to comment there <b style="color:seagreen">Noyster</b> (talk),  13:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

death report
the contacted persons seemed a bit lame on connecting with anyone else. I would have put a very different approach to what they have put up. The project was calling out for itself after user Good Ol'Factory created a vast sea of categories relating to death - he being one of the the front of the page is all you worry about people - - the death project was begging to happen. So inasmuch as anyone ever might say they create a project - the 'cause' was not adequately explained or acknowledged - the category and front of page people up there in 300k edits range may have created front space, but few if any ever go anywhere near the talk pages for project tags. So there is much more to the project than the 3 interviewed said. So be it. Also User:Pollinosisss should have been acknowledged as the death portal main editor satusuro 04:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Satusuro: It's unfortunate that more people did not offer their opinion to the report, but I had to publish with what I had. As a member of the wikiproject, you were welcome to contribute also. I don't have huge amounts of time at the moment to do thorough investigations, so the quality of the reports may vary. I only apologise for not representing WikiProject Death better.  Rcsprinter123    (jive)  @ 18:01, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * nah on closer inspection of my watchlist - I am at fault, my very very sincerest apologies - it (my watchlist) is simply too large - I missed your message at the project talk page ... sorry about that - also it is good as a report. I was being far too critical.  What is good is that geniac acknowledged polinossis and good oldfactory, after my comment at the report page inside signpost.  The actual scope development and refinement is something the project needs to re-examine down the line, and really, I am being far too over optimistic about what a report can do. In the end it was fine, my problem, not yours. satusuro 15:52, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * OK, glad this is resolved.  Rcsprinter123    (vent)  @ 17:19, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Tech News: 2015-07
<section begin="technews-2015-W07"/> Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Recent software changes
 * You can now use  to transclude a section with its title.

Problems
 * MediaWiki was reverted to the previous version on February 4. It was because of a performance issue. It was restored later.
 * UploadWizard was broken on February 4 because of the revert of MediaWiki.
 * All sites were broken for 30 minutes on February 5. It was due to a network problem.

Software changes this week
 * The new version of MediaWiki has been on test wikis and MediaWiki.org since February 5. It will be on non-Wikipedia wikis from February 10. It will be on all Wikipedias from February 11 (calendar).
 * You can have one user page for all wikis. Your Meta user page will show if you don't have a user page on a wiki. You can test this tool on test wikis.
 * You can search for media files in VisualEditor more easily. Images are bigger and you see the size and license.
 * It is easier to review your changes when you save the page in VisualEditor. The window is wider.
 * You can read the latest news about VisualEditor. You can now join weekly meetings with developers. During the meetings you can tell developers which bugs are the most important. The first meeting is on February 11 at 20:00 (UTC).

Future changes
 * Administrators will soon be able to delete change tags used fewer than 5,000 times.
 * In the future you will be able to have personal lists of articles on the mobile site.

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe. <section end="technews-2015-W07"/> 16:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Maps
Hi. How did you create these maps? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Maps_of_Caddo_Parish,_Louisiana I noticed that Plains, Kansas & Parkerfield, Kansas don't have a map similar to Meade, Kansas. • Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 08:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Sbmeirow: The map for Meade County, which contains Plains, had already been made but for some reason, Plains had not been highlighted and uploaded in its own file. I have done this and added it to the article.
 * As for Parkerfield, I'm not sure, but it doesn't appear on the maps for the county so I can only guess that they used 2000 census data, and did not include Parkerfield which was incorporated in 2004. I have added it to the maps, and updated the article.  Rcsprinter123    (parlez)  @ 17:21, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Wow, thanks a lot!!! I've been looking for a fix for multiple cities in Kansas.  Back when the 2010 census was released, I went through every city article for Kansas and cleaned them up, and I noticed at that time some of the maps were missing.  I seem to remember at least one more city in northeast Kansas that is missing a map, I but I couldn't find it when I originally asked you this question.  I still have a lot of cities to reprocess on this pass, so I'll get back to you in the coming weeks if/when I find it again.  •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 22:09, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * By the way, do nice maps exist for unincorporated communities, like Aulne, Kansas? I've been wondering if there was a solution to fix these types of articles.  I'm not asking you to upload all the maps, but wondering if the maps exist or where to find them, because I'll do some work to fix the problem if I could find a way to create the maps or get access to the pre-made map files.  •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 22:09, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Sbmeirow: The maps that were made before I began doing them do not include unincorporated areas, although I don't know why - illustrators' preference. Although it would be possible for me to update them all, it would be a huge task, simply because of the sheer number of counties already covered. So, unless there are some particularly notable CDPs, whose counties could be done, it would probably be best to leave updating the thousands of maps. I don't think it would be possible for you to create them either, because the method of creation is complex and highly controlled.
 * When you remember what the northeast Kansas city is, I would be happy to do any updating, as well as maps for whole counties that haven't been done yet (states OK, TX, NY, PA, MA, ME, NC, SC, VA, WV, KY, OH, LA, VT, NH, TN), on request. And I'm not even an American!  Rcsprinter123    (blab)  @ 20:12, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Ottawa County, Oklahoma, including the following former mining towns for historical reasons Picher, Oklahoma and Cardin, Oklahoma. Tahlequah, Oklahoma - ugly map, college town, county seat. Cushing, Oklahoma - major oil storage hub town. I put watches on these towns, so I can do some cleanup after you add the new map.  •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 22:38, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Picher and Cardin, as ghost towns, do not have any actual borders, like a municipality or CDP does, so they cannot be included on this style of map. Tahlequah and Cushing are do-able though; I shall try to do them this week.  Rcsprinter123    (cajole)  @ 22:55, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Picher and Cardin existed in the 2000 census, even replacing the old city limits with a Black-Dot and larger Red-Circle would be fine, just like lots of tiny-tiny cities in Kansas. It's your choice, since I'm just asking for things. •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 00:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I've made a start by completing Payne Co., (Cushing), just FYI.  Rcsprinter123    (palaver)  @ 18:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, looks great! I went through all the communities in Payne County, Oklahoma and cleaned up all the articles. I noticed maps were missing from Mulhall and Orlando. Both sit on a county line, so maybe the map exists in the other county?  •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 02:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

I chose not to make Payne County maps for Mulhall and Orlando because those settlements are mostly in the county to the west, so they will appear in that county's maps when I do them. Also, it is a standard caption to put "and in the state of (state)" under the map, so this will not need removing.  Rcsprinter123    (cackle)  @ 21:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * I can set it back in other states, but I've been working on changing all cities in Kansas over to "Location within XYZ County and Kansas" and plan to stick to it, for 3 reasons: 1) to prevent wrapping to a 2nd line. 2) redundant information, because its listed as a state a few lines below. I leave the word "county" since those names are far less common than state names. 3) Americans commonly does not talk nor write "the state of" before the state name. •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 14:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Sbmeirow: I've done Ottawa County, that is Picher and Cardin, and made a note in the map caption that the city limits are the former ones. If you have any further requests in future, you are welcome to ask.  Rcsprinter123    (articulate)  @ 21:30, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! •  Sbmeirow  •  Talk  • 23:06, 13 February 2015 (UTC)