User talk:Rcsprinter123/Archives/7

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:46, 2 January 2012 (UTC)</

DYK nomination of Christmas in Hawaii
Hello! Your submission of Christmas in Hawaii at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Eagles   24/7  (C)  07:56, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

 * No prob. Just another day...  Rcsprinter   (gossip)  20:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Your AfD close
I agree with your close of the AfD on George W. Bush substance abuse controversy, but I had to fix a small technical mistake. Where there's been a prior AfD, you need to use a different template. Otherwise, the link that's supposed to lead to the second discussion just goes back to the first one. See Template:Old AfD multi/doc for the gory details. JamesMLane t c 03:19, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

WikiCup/History/2012/Submissions/Rcsprinter123
Hi, I'm afraid I have removed the DYK for which you claimed points, as you did most of the work and nominated it last year. The work and nomination must have been done this year. If you have any questions, please contact me on my talk page. Thanks, J Milburn (talk) 16:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 04:49, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Old trafford stadium.jpeg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Old trafford stadium.jpeg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Don't know if this counts...
but the poster for Kull the Conqueror has "KULL ROCKS" printed over the top quarter. Thank you! Shir-El  too  14:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Er... Why are you telling me this?  Rcsprinter  (whisper)  17:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

An idea to think about
Hi Rcsprinter. I just wanted to drop by and propose an idea that Maryana told me about...

The gist is, we're working on A/B testing the warning templates used by bots and other tools with this WikiProject. We know your bot that reverts test edits doesn't leave a warning (which is fine by us), but we are currently testing the warnings of 28bot, which does the same thing as your bot.

What we're interested in doing is testing to see whether it is better to leave a warning or not, by comparing what registered editors do after being reverted by both your bots. This wouldn't require changing how your bot works, just implementing some stuff to track which editors get reverted. If that sounds interesting, let me know and I'll explain more.

Thanks, Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   22:02, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Hi there. First, my bot does issue warnings, (see?), but very rarely and only if the test edit is quite large and disruptive. I would be interested in this thing. I can't see my warnings getting in the way of the test though, if it's only made 7 in three months. Tell me how to implement this tracking stuff, it seems interesting, a nice initiative!  Rcsprinter  (articulate)  16:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

You've got mail!
SarahStierch (talk) 22:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I've replied by email.  Rcsprinter  (constabulary)  16:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Redirects for Creation
Hi Rcsprinter, unless you have any opposition to it, i shall be creating Alephbeth (see discussion here). Either way, please let me know. Cheers, benzband  ( talk ) 21:39, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh sh!t. I got my spelling wrong in google (alephbet/alephbeth). Sorry about that, i'm getting a bit tired. Cheers, benzband  ( talk ) 21:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 18:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism Info
Hey Rc, if you wouldn't mind when you change the template put your own name own it, Thanks. Dan653 (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes.  Rcsprinter  (converse)  11:50, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Begin Chess for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Begin Chess is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Begin Chess until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SyG (talk) 11:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hey, you wanted it, you got it. Thanks anyway.  Rcsprinter   (lecture)  18:13, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low to High, while for quality the scale goes from Low  to High.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:04, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks. I do my best. :)  Rcsprinter  (talkin' to me?)  14:50, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Coastliner 700 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coastliner 700 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Coastliner 700 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bob Re-born (talk) 14:59, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Thurmaston Bus
I see that you non-admin closed this one. What ended up happening with the other nominated article, Coachmaster (bus_company)? UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 21:51, 30 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Could you please reverse your close in order to permit discussion about the second nominated article? This would not affect the first article, already userfied - your close on that one is fine, but it's just that there were two. No need to re-nominate the second when the original AFD is a day old. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 13:01, 31 January 2012 (UTC)