User talk:Rd989/Fainting goat

- Lead is off to a great start, however adding some information on molecular basis, the human condition, preserving the species, etc, may be beneficial by suggesting what is to come later in the article. - Has a clear structure, overall organized well. Section lengths are proportional to importance. The headings created (such as under the characteristics section) made the article much easier to navigate. - Seems as though citation [13] needs the date value checked, may just be inappropriate format of citation. - All links to citations are working. - I would suggest possibly looking for more recent articles for some citations such as [13] and [1] if there are other works available. - You could further investigate the material and methods section, suggesting how other scientists have studied this behaviour in the past. - All the information added by the contributor was relevant to the topic and each fact was supported by a reliable resource. - Content is neutral, no bias. Great wording choices. - Could possibly ass some more media to the article.

Overall, a fantastic contribution! All the best finishing it up. Rp8848 (talk) 18:53, 5 November 2019 (UTC)Rp8848