User talk:Rdavout

I migrated the old stuff here: User_talk:Rdavout/2015old. Please feel welcome to talk to me here :)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on M-150 (energy drink). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 19:25, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * This deletionist editor believes that he has some sort of a magical right to delete things from other people? (I have tried to keep other unsourced elements because in my understand that's how Wikipedia works: an unfrequented article is modified one day by an unfrequent contributor, someone else flags his addition with a tag, a few months to years later someone finally finds the reference. Remove the initial content, and most often than final part will never happen.)

VERIFY
Please do not add or change content, as you did at M-150 (energy drink), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 19:26, 27 June 2015 (UTC)


 * This editor really has the nerves! I provided all reliable references to this article and his deletions actually primarily affected content that I did not add. Rdavout (talk) 19:56, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Premature removal of notability tag
You aren't doing an article any favors by removing the notability tag before it's had a chance to be improved. Leaving the tag on means it will get more attention from editors who are motivated to improve it and (potentially) save it from deletion. Don't jump to the conclusion that the tag = deletion. — Brianhe (talk) 20:55, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Well understood. Thanks for taking the time to explain that point. Rdavout (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

Are you familiar with the WP:Terms of use?
A change in the terms of use made a year ago requires that if you are a paid editor that you disclose your staus as a paid editor and that you disclose your client and affiliations. May I ask if you are being paid to edit the M-150 article? Let me know if you need any help with the terminology. Smallbones( smalltalk ) 02:01, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello! I was not paid to edit that article. For a full disclaimer I have purchased a few dozen of the drinks over the course of my lifetime though I hadn't consumed any M-150 while contributing to the article or in a number of years before that contribution and haven't even purchased any since that date. Funny that contribution was pointed out. I wonder if Jytdog was asked if he was paid to push for its deletion despite clear notability in a South-East Asian context. Rdavout (talk) 12:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Champagne-Polka moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Champagne-Polka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 20:30, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Ägyptischer Marsch moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Ägyptischer Marsch, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 20:43, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Champagne-Polka (February 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Champagne-Polka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Champagne-Polka, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Champagne-Polka Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KylieTastic&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Champagne-Polka reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ägyptischer Marsch (February 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ägyptischer Marsch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ägyptischer Marsch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%C3%84gyptischer_Marsch Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%C3%84gyptischer_Marsch reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 15:08, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Rdavout Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rdavout&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Rdavout reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rdavout (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC) What's the point of having stubs, I wonder!? Rdavout (talk) 15:53, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ägyptischer Marsch (February 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ägyptischer Marsch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ägyptischer Marsch, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%C3%84gyptischer_Marsch Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:%C3%84gyptischer_Marsch reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:43, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TiddlyWiki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anki. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 5 October 2021 (UTC)