User talk:Rdewitt92/Positive psychology

I'm very impressed by your organization, and appreciate the ease of reviewing what you've been working on! Honestly, everything is looking great so far. I don't have any immediate suggestions for improvement. I think that all changes you have made so far have been very appropriate, particularly the alteration to the lead starting sentence. Your notes to me as a reviewer also encouraged me to make notes to those who are to be reviewing my page. I appreciate your diligence to inspect the cited sources for appropriateness and it looks like that diligence paid off. Great work so far!Hphilli2 (talk) 04:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

''thank you! Glad to have helped inspire you to be more organized. I wish I were this organized in all aspects of my life. :) Rdewitt92 (talk) 02:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)''

You have done a great job on finding the errors and issues pertaining to citations in your article! Also, your ability to seek out repeated information and condense it into direct and easy understandable information is well developed. Keep up the great work!! Mcampbell14 (talk) 22:06, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

''thanks! Rdewitt92 (talk) 02:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)''

I like that you thoroughly reviewed sources for accuracy and relevance. However, I am a bit confused in terms of the changes you made to your article- did you change the original information (with the faulty/irrelevant sources) along with the revised sources you provided? Just making sure, your article looks great so far! (Vsol98 (talk) 00:10, 7 October 2019 (UTC))

''While many of the sources were inappropriate for the purposes of wikipedia, the information was correct. I simply found a reliable source and kept any information that I felt was relevant. I did remove some information that was attached to bad sources, as well. I used my discretion as to what I thought the article needed. Rdewitt92 (talk) 02:31, 7 October 2019 (UTC)''

The work in your sandbox looks great and from what I see you. The information displayed shows on the subsections of the articles displays on the information thoroughly. The changes made on this article looks good especially with the edits in correcting the appropriate citations that are used. Good work and keep it up!Vidaphan12

''thanks! this project has definitely gotten me looking at wikipedia sources on the regular. I'm glad to have learned this skill. Rdewitt92 (talk) 02:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)''