User talk:Rdht

Image tagging for Image:Chakra01.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Chakra01.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 22:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chakra02.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Chakra02.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:53, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Chakra images
These don't actually look like screenshots of software, which is what the free screenshot tag is designed for. Did you design the images yourself? Are they from a website somewhere you found? We need more information, or they will have to be deleted, despite being very fine images. Please see Uploading images for more information. -- nae'blis 16:18, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chakra03.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Chakra03.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:53, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Chakra04.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Chakra04.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

July 2009
The recent edit you made to Sea urchin constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Zhang He (talk) 17:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:Sea urchin. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Chevy  Impala   2009  17:26, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Your edits to Sea Urchin
Hi Rdht and thank you for your edits, for most regular anti-vandalism editors your edit will look at first glance like unjustified removal of content or "blanking", I'd like you to know I've reinstated your edits. Thanks. - Jeffrey Mall  |  Talk2Me  |  BNosey  - 17:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello. Warning removed and sorry about the revert; with huggle it seemed to be vandalism. I hope you excuse me. Bye and sorry again. --Lucas Nunes (talk) 15:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)