User talk:Rdjxrjnn

RE: Cogim
I apologise if my comments on the AfD came over as critical. However, the fact is that I can't vote Keep, because the only source provided is the company's own website. From WP:CORP: A company, corporation, organization, group, product, or service is notable if it has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works, the source of which is both: Although the company might well be notable enough to merit an article, there's presently no evidence of that in the article itself. The reason WP requires independent coverage from sources is to prevent various companies using the encyclopedia for free advertising space; unfortunately, this means that perfectly good articles sometimes have to be deleted, simply because the same policy has to apply across the board. If you can find any news reports, consumer reviews, etc., that mention the company, then cite them in the article, and I will change my vote to Keep. Walton monarchist89 15:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * independent of the company, corporation, organization or group itself, or of the product's or service's manufacturer or vendor, and
 * reliable.