User talk:Rdp060707/Archives/2021/February

Eddie McGuire
Is a racist and he even said it was a "proud day" when Collingwood FC got called out for being a racist club. You can hardly call that vandalism for saying what it is. --120.22.146.148 (talk) 06:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

What? Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:24, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * You reverted my edit that Eddie McGuire is a racist, it's a true and correct account of the facts, so you can't hardly call it vandalism or a BLP issue. When it is the truth (as it even says in the article) that he admitted it was a "proud day" when it came out that Collingwood FC was decried around Australia as being a racist club. My statement is factual, and therefore any claim of vandalism or any other claim about legalities of admitting as much goes completely out the window --120.22.146.148 (talk) 06:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

On the infobox, I think it might be not adhere to the policy: WP:MOS. Also, there is no sources given. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User talk:Poopdeedoop666
Hello Rdp060707. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User talk:Poopdeedoop666, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Though this is just silly stuff, it doesn't amount to outright vandalism - see WP:DELTALK. User's talk page retained for administrative purposes. For example, if the user edits again - which I doubt the will - it is publicly readable evidence of a WP:NOTHERE behaviour. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

I guess you're right. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 03:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

SW Viewer
Hello Rdp060707, I noticed that you use SW Viewer for RC patrolling. I just wanted to ask if the user whose edit you're reverting gets warned automatically after that? Because the last time I tried using the tool, the rollback happened but the user didn't get warned and I had to warn them separately using Twinkle. -- Ashley yoursmile!  04:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Yes, that's correct. Once the user of this anti-vandalism tool reverted the problematic revision by another user, it will be automatically warned on its talk page. That's a quick one. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 04:55, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * So there a setting for that? Do I have to set that up manually by choosing some options in the tool? Apologies for asking these questions, but I couldn't find where I should go to set up the warning option so that the user gets warned automatically.. Ashley  yoursmile!  04:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

There is a "revert with summary" option in the control bar. You will find the "warn user" feature once you open the option (once you are here at SWViewer). Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much, I'll check it out soon. :) Ashley  yoursmile!  06:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

You are welcome. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Hiii
Hiiii Satyam Anand 22 (talk) 03:43, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Hello and good morning (That is the UTC time). I am very confident and happy that I have this first barnstar for the year 2021. This barnstar that you given to me is dedicated to any editors that eradicates vandalism or any kind of problematic acts on the free encyclopedia. Thank you very much! Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * You bet. You deserve it! Keep up the great work, Rdp060707! Your time and energy spent reverting vandalism makes a difference here, and I appreciate it greatly. I'll see you out there on the battlefield... Happy editing! :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   06:34, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I will see you there on the battlefield too. Rdp060707&#124;Let's discuss about the plans 06:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)