User talk:Rdrchan/sandbox

Nina's Review of Preserve Our Islands
Very informative, clear and well-written.

The edit was very focused on providing history and how POI emerged— this is great!

Also, the edit included sufficient references to provide clear information.

Minor edits that may be considered:

- Include "history" section after the lead— as to not confuse readers.

- "Preserve Our Islands was victorious." can be rephrased to: Preserve Our Islands was very successful in achieving their initial goals. (or something in this manner)

Overall, great job! :-)

Thank you very much for your advice, Nina! Rdrchan (talk) 23:40, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Harley Peer Review
I truly enjoyed your edits about Preserve Our Islands vs. Glacier Northwest, it is a topic that I was completely unaware of so its great to inform people of legal battles like these that we don't see everyday.

Some Sentences are a bit run on just because they are jam packed with information.

Perfectly unbiased and straight to the point informative with great citations and cite intergration, very well done!

Perhaps define certain words such as Aquifer? I know we all know what that is but maybe for the general public.

'''Overall, a great addition! Very well done!''' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harleyjw (talk • contribs) 07:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your advice, Harley! Rdrchan (talk) 23:42, 30 November 2017 (UTC)