User talk:Rdsknfootball08

Speedy deletion of Jake Goss
A tag has been placed on Jake Goss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 20:27, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jake Goss
A tag has been placed on Jake Goss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ridernyc 15:24, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jake Goss
A tag has been placed on Jake Goss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fabrictramp 17:05, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia you will be blocked. Elkman (Elkspeak) 19:52, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:03, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lesley Banks
A tag has been placed on Lesley Banks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 19:12, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I've removed your edit
Hey there, new user. I've removed your edit that you put on User:Elkman. If you wish to communicate with Elkman, please use his talkpage, which is called "discussion" on the tabs on the top of his userpage, or simply click here. Cheers, Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  19:47, 2 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Actually, now that you've made an inappropriate edit to my user page, you have my attention. Here's why  got deleted:
 * The first time, flagged it as a non-notable biography, and I deleted it as vandalism.  Actually, it was probably just another non-notable biography, but either way, it was not suitable for Wikipedia.  See Criteria for speedy deletion.
 * The second time you created it, flagged it as a non-notable biography, and  deleted it.
 * The third time you created it, deleted it as a non-notable biography.
 * The fourth time you created it, I again deleted it as a non-notable biography.


 * And now, just this afternoon, you created an article about your English teacher. You didn't specify why Lesley Banks is notable, or even give enough context to explain who he/she is.  So that's why your article got deleted.   flagged it as a non-notable biography and  deleted it.


 * Are you starting to see a pattern here? You've created pages that don't indicate why the subject is notable.  Even after your pages got deleted, and even after the policies were explained to you, you've insisted on re-creating those pages.  If there's something about Wikipedia policies that you're unclear about, I'll answer your questions, but I suspect that you're more interested in gaming the system and causing disruption than you are in writing an encyclopedia.  --Elkman (Elkspeak) 21:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Redskins are bad
The Redskins are horrible.--Ro098 (talk) 23:05, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me
I have nominated Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Sex, Dead Dogs, and Me. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Damiens .rf 15:31, 1 July 2008 (UTC)