User talk:Rdsmith4/Archive 5

15 Apr 2005 - 25 June 2005

168.174.253.221 vandalism.
Hello, noticed a comment you left on the talk page for 168.174.253.221 regarding blocking this ip if they vandalize again. Well, they just did it again. Looking through that ip's history I can't see a single valid edit. They are all vandalism. Can we kill this guy? x3rx3s 00:00, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thank you!
Thank you for your support on my RfA! I shall attempt to put the shiny new buttons to good use. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 00:15, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

3RR
My understanding is that the 3RR doesn't apply to simple vandalism. I think that adding 42 of the 43 US presidents to a list of "worst presidents" is both WP:POINT and vandalism. Thus the 3RR should not apply to those actions. LevelCheck 03:23, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * My contention is that these edits are indeed vandalism. Nonetheless, I'll stop now and leave it to others. LevelCheck 03:30, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Karabakh khanate
Hi Dan,

Could you please cancel redirect of Karabakh khanate to Nagorno-Karabakh? Whereas Nagorno-Karabakh refers to a geographical region, Karabakh khanate was a feudal state that existed on that territory in XVIII c. Therefoire, these are two different things and should have two separate entries. Thanks in advance. --Tabib 05:15, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

Quiz bowl victory
It's very interesting to find out that an article helped you win a quiz bowl. I would be curious to find out what the question was about. -- Emsworth 23:07, 20 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for reverting my user page. It is much appreciated. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 00:07, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Upload text
Hi, I noticed that you changed MediaWiki:Uploadtext last week. Since then, the licence bullet point on Special:Upload is displaying as: I'm guessing that tl doesn't resolve properly there, although I'm not entirely sure (and I'm not able to fix it either). Would you please be able to take a look when you have a bit of time? Thanks, JYolkowski // talk 01:57, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Specify the licence of the file by adding the appropriate tag(s), e.g., , etc. See Image copyright tags for more tags.

Hi,

you reverted the template:chem-stub to a very old version. Would you mind explaining on its discussion page, under the chem-stub discussion paragraph, why you did that? Wim van Dorst 20:28, 2005 Apr 26 (UTC).

MediaWiki:Nospecialpagetext
Hi! You have changed MediaWiki:Nospecialpagetext to include a link to Special:Specialpages (which is a good idea). However, that change has broken the message, see MediaWiki talk:Nospecialpagetext. --Mormegil 19:42, 1 May 2005 (UTC)

Matrixism vandal
Hi! You're one of the editors I've noticed reverting "Matrixism" linkspamming, so I thought you might be interested in voting on Redirects_for_deletion. Matrixism currently redirects to New religious movement, and this has been used as a justification for linkspamming in the past. I believe an overwhelming vote to delete Matrixism will demonstrate a community consensus against the linkspamming, deterring further vandalism. Thanks for your help. &mdash; Phil Welch 19:50, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Hellooo
Not much to say, except: Hi. -- Consumed Crustacean | Talk | 02:51, 5 May 2005 (UTC)

URGENT
Hi, I notice that you've deleted Wikipedia which is linked from main page. Can you explain why you did that? Even if you're moving it elsewhere you could've moved it first, fixed the links and then deleted it. I'm trying to restore the article but the server is slow. You can delete the article after explaining the reason. -- 04:24, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

There is nothing on Talk:Wikipedia and it will keep being restored until you explain yourself. --Henrygb 04:27, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Read your explanation. Thanks. I knew that you were upto something and this is what I wanted to know. -- Sundar 13:06, May 6, 2005 (UTC)

Someone's impersonating you
Check out User:RDsmith4 Yuber(talk) 00:21, 8 May 2005 (UTC)


 * I personally suspect it is whoever has been going by the name of ElKabong and disrupting Islamofascism, but it's just a hunch. BrandonYusufToropov 01:24, 8 May 2005 (UTC)

205.188.116.203
is an AOL proxy, so you might want to shorten the block a little (especially since the user has already moved on to a different proxy). Thanks for helping in the reverting! --W(t) 2024-July-29

could you block?
It would appear nobody's watching VIP at the moment, could you block 24.190.97.181? He's had his share of warnings and reverts. Thanks. --W(t) 16:56, 2005 May 15 (UTC)
 * Never mind, it's been handled. --W(t) 17:24, 2005 May 15 (UTC)

Template:Commons
I know all about the "wrong version" argument and all, but I wish you'd protected it on a version which doesn't unnecessarily waste server resources by incorporating that meta-template Template:Sisterproject. In the absence of anything else, and ignoring even me, this project's database developer has asked us not to use templates in that way. See Avoid using meta-templates. It's harmful to the project, and shouldn't stand. -- Netoholic @ 05:17, 2005 May 16 (UTC)
 * To participate in the edit war and then protect the template would not have been appropriate. I protected it as soon as I noticed the edit war. &mdash; Dan | Talk 11:53, 16 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Would you also protect a page where the last edit was vandalous, enshrining it? That would be one page, but I'm sure you wouldn't let it stand.  This template (and others like it) are used on thousands of pages in total, and regarding Template:Sisterproject specifically, database developer User:Jamesday said "Please avoid creating a single template which is used on more than a small percentage of the pages on the site".  Please treat this like any other sort of disruption to Wikipedia.   This isn't a stylistic or content dispute, it is about a couple users who insist on doing exactly the opposite of what's been asked of us by the preeminant authority on Wikipedia's server resources.  Please consider helping me, not just with this template, but them all.  Don't protect on a version which is intentionally and realistically disruptive to Wikipedia. -- Netoholic @ 17:10, 2005 May 16 (UTC)

Thanks
For fixing my user page. Filiocht | Blarneyman 07:19, May 16, 2005 (UTC)

Rovoam
I just noticed that you've blocked Rovoam for a little over 20 years. I was just wondering on what basis you enacted such a lengthy block? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 07:27, May 19, 2005 (UTC)


 * No, I'm familiar with the problem that Rovoam represents, I was wondering if the ArbCom had banned him, because I'm unaware of a procedure whereby an admin unilaterally perma-bans a logged-in user. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 17:57, May 19, 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm not going to unblock him as I also believe he should probably be perma-blocked. Perhaps we should ask for an ArbCom ruling to support the perma-block so we have something to point to, for propriety's sake. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 19:41, May 19, 2005 (UTC)

Upload policy
Hi, I gather you added the original version of the text at the bottom of MediaWiki:Uploadtext. Myself and another user were wondering what the origin of this rather strange policy is. It'd be much appreciated if you could explain the situation on the talk page. Thanks Lupin 14:50, 19 May 2005 (UTC)

Edits on Missing Wikipedians
Rdsmith4, please stop reverting the edits on Missing Wikipedians and yes they are missing and you are gonna accept it. I'm getting tired of trying to restore them. -- Mike Garcia | talk 20:02, 19 May 2005

Your reverts at List of self-proclaimed deities
I would appreciate an explanation of your reverts on this article. The discussion about the name of the article is on going. I do not see the reason for your involvement. If your involvement is an admin, then explain the reasons. If your involvement is as an editor, do the same. Thanks. --Zappaz 18:33, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

Unrequested and improper protection
I must protest your protection of Template:British Royal Family and I direct you to the relevant Talk page for discussion. Nobody asked for protection, you unilaterally reverted changes and then protected your reversion, this is improper admin behavior in my opinion. Whig 03:29, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Question
By your edit summary on WP:VIP, you wrote "User:Yuber - this isn't vandalism. Begone." Are you a fan of Around the Horn on ESPN? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 22:57, 25 May 2005 (UTC)

Ambrosian republic
I hope you can make this clumsy effort more informative and more accurate. --Wetman 04:29, 31 May 2005 (UTC)

Richard Montgomery High School
I'm treading a thin WP:3RR line on Richard Montgomery High School. As an admin, could you give your opinion on if I've crossed the line yet, and if I could remove additional anonymous edits along the same vein as simple vandalism? Thanks much. --BaronLarf 02:46, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)

Thank You
What a year! My first year in Wiki, a featured article and now administrator. Thank you for your support. Tony the Marine

Introduction templates
I am not an admin so I can't. Can you unmove the Introduction template that User:MarSch moved. Template:Introduction1 and while you are at it protect Template:Please don't change this page and Template:Please don't edit this page until he slows down, talks about his changes and uses a sandbox more effectively for complex edits. I don't think his changed comment is going to stop any of the vandalism. Trödel 16:48, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Trödel 22:52, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Cuba-stub
Hi - I've just discovered your stub template Cuba-stub. Stub templates are normally created after a lengthy debating process at WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria, which determines whether the proposed template will fit in with the stub category hierarchy and - most importantly - whether there are enough stubs to warrant the creation of a new stub type. In the case of Cuba-stub, in one month only three articles were put into the category, and of them two were geo-stubs not general stubs (and as such should have been stubbed with caribbean-geo-stub, as there are far too few cuban geography stubs to warrant a separate category). I've listed your template at WikiProject Stub sorting/Criteria - if you'd like to comment about it there, feel free to do so! Grutness...  wha?  04:25, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Swedish Grand Prix
Hi - just wondering why you've removed the pole positions and fastest laps information from the Swedish Grand Prix article? Also, marking an edit like that as minor might not really be a good idea as that's quite a major change to the article. Thanks - Worldtraveller 01:36, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Walter Mondale
Can you confirm that he's dead? Dmn / &#1332;&#1396;&#1398; 00:06, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thanks
for reverting my user page :) -Frazzydee|&#9997; 23:28, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

About editing pages
I edited another page to correct inaccuracy; I didn't see your messages yet. I didn't mean to vandalize anything; I must have thought that EVERYONE could edit pages. Still, I am sorry for my actions, and I promise to edit pages only when I have signed up as a member.

Sincerely, the Vandalizer you warned on June 6

EDIT: Oh, after checking up on the rules, I realized that I had not been doing anything wrong; it's okay for anyone to edit pages. I guess I got a message intended for someone else. My mistake.

Still, I will not vandalize anything; I will only edit to add new information or to correct wrong information.

French nobility
hi dan, well that´s what I would like to know as well? the Count of Paris is listed as Comte de Paris, as is the Duc de Berry and the Duc de Broglie. It´s vicomte Cavaignac and not Vicsount Cavaignac, and princesse des ursins and not Princess of Ursins. which is fine, because they are French and have french names and titles. If you also look at Karl Ritter von Ghega, the name is kept in German, and not in english. because in english, the translation would make no sense (Charles Knight of Ghega?). So what is the policy here? I moved them in order for the listing to be consistent. My opinion is that this is an english-language website, but Wikipedia is all about authenticity, right? Then the authentic name would be in the original language. Just like everyone is learning english, english-speakers would do well to learn the native written way and name as well... Antares911 09:10, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Editnote
I feel strongly that it is a bad idea to be subst: templates that are part of an open TFD, since it prevents people from using the "What links here" button on the template to see how and where they are used.

It seems likely that your side will win the TFD, but still I would ask that you refrain from substituting it until it has had its full 7 days of consideration.

Thanks.

Dragons flight 20:54, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

I replied to you at Template talk:editnote. Dragons flight 21:54, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)


 * Also, why are you un-substituting &#123;&#123;tl&#125;&#125; as in eg. this edit? You should be substituting them, not the other way around. Alphax &tau;&epsilon;&chi; 04:29, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Thank you
Hi Dan! I want to thank you for your support on my RFA. I know it's a bit overdue, but I finally had some time to thank everyone. I have been using my new admin powers to hunt down vandals and crush them under my foot, squishing them like the BUGS that they are, and then eating their LIVERS WITH SOME FAVA BEANS AND... *ahem*. What I'm trying to say is Thank You! ;-) Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 23:35, Jun 15, 2005 (UTC)

Just thought I'd say Hi, and Thanks...
 * Whew! I see you were fighting a vandal revert war on Landfill Gas Fabartus 18:51, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Collaboration of the week
I'm dropping you a note to let you know that The Seventies, which you voted on, became a Collaboration of the Week! You are highly encouraged to contribute whatever you can to the topic! Mike H 01:22, Jun 20, 2005 (UTC)

Forgotten FPC?
Hi Dan,

Thanks for that. I remember the image and rather liked it. Looks like I didn't close the nomination on this one, but I do occasionally find problems with saves on some of the FP pages not actually saving. I'd guess that's what happened in this case, as its correctly placed on several of the other FP archiving pages.

Unfortunately I'm too tired to fix it now, but I will try and get to it in the morning. It is more than likely that there are others missing from one of the pages, or placed in the wrong section. -- Solipsist 22:02, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Just thought I'd say hi.
 * Was checking back on an edit I made (Natural Gas) looking for a stub I'd created as a result of my edit and followed a contributors link to User_talk:24.4.51.184 where you'd left a note to stop vandalizing (Twice). 24.4.51...'s changes look ok to me, so I was wondering what generated the warning... There seems to be few contribs, so maybe you scared him off, which means I have to question someone else.


 * What ever was going on. Should I fact check the article?
 * [[User:Fabartus|FrankB || TalktoMe]] 01:43, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Just thought I'd say hi.
 * Was checking back on an edit I made (Natural Gas) and followed a contributors link to User_talk:24.4.51.184 where you'd left a note to stop vandalizing (Twice). 24.4.51...'s changes look ok to me, so I was wondering what generated the warning... There seems to be few contribs, so maybe you scared him off, which means I have to question someone else. [[User:Fabartus|FrankB || TalktoMe]] 01:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

FPC
When I said quality, I meant file quality not photographic (style) quality. The file seems noisy to me. Especially near the front of the car it seems pixelated or fuzzy or noisy (i can't really explain it). It's most evident in the black at the bottom of the page. My other concern is the lack of detail on the figure (the main subject). I can't really see the figure's face and because of the angle. It really is a fairly small concern and if the vote is close I will reconsider. This link is Broken 04:00, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Merge tags
Your views on merge tags are cordially requested over at Template_talk:Merge so that we can get a tag acceptable to all which does not keep changing. MeltBanana 15:13, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Please do join us again. I support your view that simple text is better than offensive boxes. -- Netoholic @ June 28, 2005 17:23 (UTC)

MARMOT
Looks like he's at it again. Your suggestion? Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:42, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Cool. By the way, my new big project is to completely redesign WP:VIP as well as the long-term alerts. I will give you a shout when I'm ready to redesign. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:46, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * And he's at it again! It's actually kind of funny to watch :P Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:47, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * And again... lol Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:50, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * He's doing it under the IP of 62.253.96.44. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:53, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

I doubt it. The problem with MARMOT is that he falls into a really annoying catagory... he is disruptive, but he doesn't even realize why people are angry at him. Prepare for a long haul; this could literally take a while. Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:56, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * See what I mean? Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 14:57, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Told ya. As soon as his IP block was clear, he was back at it. Would you like to do the honors? Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 15:50, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Cool stuff. Keep me informed! Linuxbeak | Talk | Desk 16:04, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)