User talk:Re-quest

Articles for deletion/Eva Vlaardingerbroek
As noted at the top, you may not edit a closed discussion. If you feel it was closed in error, you may open a Deletion Review. Star  Mississippi  19:22, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I just replied to an explicit question and noted both the page deletion and the article closure only after I did. You were even faster in reverting the changes than I were. To be honest, this all does not feel like a respectful discussion, leaving bad vibes over a topic I do not even care about. Why? Re-quest (talk) 19:29, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * There was plenty of respectful discussion, it just appears she does not meet biographic notability. You're welcome to open a deletion review if you feel there were problems, not simply because you disagree. You also did not disclose where you heard about the discussion. Star   Mississippi  19:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I did disclose it, just not in time, and now I am not allowed to answer anymore: the ongoing discussion was clearly indicated in a banner above the page - as I understand, its purpose is to encourage people to voice their opinion, which I did. To me, the question felt like and inquiry, as if I was accused of intruding an internal discussion and need to justify why I want to participate. I still do not see this as overly respectful, but YMMV. Definitely not opening a review, I still think the article served its purpose, but others don't, so be it. I was lucky to find it early enough when I needed it. :-) Re-quest (talk) 20:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You are not a relatively new editor with no history editing the subject, which is why you were asked. No one is allowed to edit a closed discussion. I promise, it isn't personal. The discussion ran for longer than the minimum to allow consensus to form. Star   Mississippi  20:33, 22 November 2022 (UTC)