User talk:ReLive

Welcome!
Hello, ReLive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Opencooper (talk) 04:49, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of My Wife is Wagatsuma-san
Hello ReLive,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged My Wife is Wagatsuma-san for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. GainRuz (talk) 04:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

My Wife is Wagatsuma-san
Hi welcome to Wikipedia! I've removed the speedy deletion template that the other user placed since the article now contains context. However, it isn't out of the water yet and may still be nominated for deletion (which takes a week to complete, so you have time if it happens). The main issue with the article is that Wikipedia articles are required to clearly show notability. This can be as easy as listing prominent awards won or it could require coverage in reliable sources. This requirement is needed because articles on Wikipedia are required to be verifiable and we cannot engage in original research. Unfortunately, I did a search for the manga and the only coverage of it at all are incidental mentions of Crunchyroll offering it and other titles digitally. Therefore I will likely be nominating it myself for deletion since there won't be much to write about it such as critical reception, sales, themes, production, or more, without engaging in original research. However, don't be discouraged! See Your first article for some helpful tips for the future, especially determining the notability of a subject before you write about it. This can all be overwhelming, so I'd recommend starting out with smaller edits first to get a feel for Wikipedia. You're also more than welcome to join WikiProject Anime and manga, which has helpful resources and experienced users you can consult. There are also other places you can ask for help listed in the welcome message at the top of this page, or you could always message me. Thank you for your contributions and I hope that helps. Opencooper (talk) 04:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello ReLive, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to My Wife is Wagatsuma-san has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Opencooper (talk) 05:00, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of My Wife is Wagatsuma-san for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article My Wife is Wagatsuma-san is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/My Wife is Wagatsuma-san until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Opencooper (talk) 05:36, 28 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello Opencooper Opencooper, I like to ask you for your well experience to please give me tips on how to improve this article to avoid deletion. I know very well that you nominated this article for deletion due to the lack of sources, if you could please give me examples of what type of sources are needed to be complete. Thank you for reading and your help, ReLive.
 * Hey. Unfortunately I was unable to find any usable sources, which is why I nominated it for deletion in the first place. The current problem isn't that the article lacks sources (that can be fixed in time), but rather that there aren't any sources to establish that the series is notable, which for manga series means reviews by reliable sources. For a non-comprehensive list of reliable animanga sources, see this page. Also, if you're able to read Japanese, there might be non-English sources that cover the manga. Other things that establish notability are things like if it won any awards or was any best-selling lists. But based on its coverage on Anime News Network that doesn't seem to be the case here. Regardless of what happens, I wouldn't consider it the biggest loss. Wikipedia is really selective about what content it hosts. There are plenty of better places like Wikias for manga or a personal site where you could write to your heart's content without people like me breathing down your neck :). Opencooper (talk) 08:09, 28 March 2016 (UTC)