User talk:ReVeluv02/Archive 1

Welcome!
Hello, LipaCityPH, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Diannaa (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Your cut and paste page move has been reversed
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Love Yourself World Tour a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into REDMARE. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:27, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Music samples
Hello, I noted that you uploaded several music samples, such as File:Red Velvet - Be Natural (feat. TAEYONG).ogg. Please keep in mind WP:NFCC that a sample can only last for maximum 30 seconds. If the music samples fail this requirement, they will be deleted from Wikipedia. Thanks, and have fun editing, HĐ (talk) 04:06, 21 December 2020 (UTC)


 * I see that you have modified yourself the music samples. Thank you very much and I'm sorry for the inconvenience I have caused. LipaCityPH

Your GA nomination of Red Velvet (group)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Red Velvet (group) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 웬디러비 -- 웬디러비 (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

GA review
Hi, I hope you are doing well. I was wondering if you could do the GAN for my article, the 1989 World Tour? Thank you so much in advance, HĐ (talk) 05:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi! I badly want to do it however, I'm very unfamiliar yet with the criteria and how to review a good article nominations. I only edit, fix, and rewrite articles for the meantime. I'm currently trying to learn the system and environment of Wikipedia for now. I do feel sorry since you did a very great job in reviewing the article I nominated yet I can't do the same to you. I apologize for that. :( I will try my best to learn it so that I will be able to do reviews in the future. I hope this doesn't affect the (little friendship?) we had because of the teamwork for the Psycho (Red Velvet song) :) LipaCityPH (talk) 05:46, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries, it's fine! I understand it takes time to learn through the process of reviewing and nominating articles, so don't feel obliged to fulfill my wish! I hope you will learn a lot during your time here, HĐ (talk) 07:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

I think we can deepen RV article.
As watching BTS, I think we can make article much deeper with information.
 * We can update their photo, because they've been working until 2019.
 * We can describe their "Red" and "Velvet" theme much further, because it is one of their features of music.
 * We can add some accidents or incidents that is related to Red Velvet such as Wendy's fall or Irene's gapjil incident or reporter's interview during 2018 Pyongyang concert
 * We can add the fandom of Red Velvet.

Well, I have more idea to improve RV article, so if you have any idea, please leave message on talk page. -- Wendylove (talk) 10:48, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hello there! Thank you for talking about these matters! I do agree that we need to do a lot of adding information on Red Velvet's article/page. What I do worry the most however is the sources needed for those information. What I meant was "reliable sources" that will support and be added to references section of the page. This is because that:
 * There are few references that I can see regarding their concept (which I am sad about) :(
 * The pictures needed are required to be in rules/laws of Wikimedia Commons in which they are very stict about copyrighted materials. There are few pictures uploaded. Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Red_Velvet_(musical_group)
 * I think adding accidents or incidents that is related to Red Velvet is also okay, however I don't know whether it fits the article of Red Velvet or the individual pages/articles of the members. Please enlighten me about this. :)
 * I wanted to add the fandom before. Let's add it after we fully plan our addition of articles to Red Velvet (group) page! :) Hope to be working with you soon regarding these matters. LipaCityPH (talk) 11:14, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll find some Korean articles which include those things we discussed. Let's try to make it "Good Article" -- Wendylove (talk) 02:16, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * That would be great! Thank you so much! I'll try to help as soon as possible. Happy New Year! :) LipaCityPH (talk) 06:33, 01 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Would U, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Liar and His Lover. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Umpah Umpah
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Umpah Umpah you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nkon21 -- Nkon21 (talk) 22:21, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank you so much for reviewing the article. I hope to work with you in making this article under GA! Thank you once again! :) LipaCityPH (talk) 02:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Umpah Umpah
The article Umpah Umpah you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Umpah Umpah for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nkon21 -- Nkon21 (talk) 16:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Umpah Umpah
The article Umpah Umpah you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Umpah Umpah for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Nkon21 -- Nkon21 (talk) 03:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Happiness (Red Velvet song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Happiness (Red Velvet song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Happiness (Red Velvet song)
The article Happiness (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Happiness (Red Velvet song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 15:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry about the fail, but it had to be done with the article's current state; are you understanding of this? --K. Peake 15:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry I replied late. I do understand. Still, thank you for the effort you made on making the comments! I'll still follow your comments so that in the future, the article will be eligible for GA. Thank you once again. LipaCityPH (talk) 09:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Double Patty
Hi! I moved the article you created to Draft:Double Patty as it did not have any sources. Films need to have significant coverage by independent, reliable sources to have a standalone article, per WP:NF. Please continue to add to the draft when the subject receives more coverage, then submit the article for creation. Let me know if you have any questions! BOVINEBOY 2008 23:35, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Level Up Project!.png
Thank you for uploading File:Level Up Project!.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Wikiacc (¶) 04:07, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red Flavor
The article Red Flavor you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Red Flavor for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 14:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red Flavor
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Red Flavor you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Now the article has been placed on hold (bot will deliver message soon), I would recommend focusing on the suggested changes before making any other edits. Good thing that I am making progress to reviewing a future GA for you, unlike the failure last time! --K. Peake 14:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I understand. Thank you so much! :) I'm sorry for the sudden edits and addition of new information. I'm also currently working on the article now. Thank you for giving your time in reviewing this article. User:LipaCityPH (talk) 14:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * My pleasure; it was tiring reviewing such a large article from you, but it feels worth it for sure! --K. Peake 21:24, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I really do appreciate your effort. ^-^ Thank you so much! :) I'm doing my best in revising and editing the article based from your review and instructions. I've also read your new instructions regarding the article. I'm working on it! :) User:LipaCityPH (talk) 14:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Good to know you are keeping up to date, but if anything has confused you then feel free to let me know! --K. Peake 20:44, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red Flavor
The article Red Flavor you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Red Flavor for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 17:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Red Velvet - Spring is Coming (performance screenshot).png
Thank you for uploading File:Red Velvet - Spring is Coming (performance screenshot).png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Happiness (Red Velvet song)
The article Happiness (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Happiness (Red Velvet song) for issues which need to be addressed. I delivered this message since the bot still had not notified you of the article being reviewed earlier, so I am sure it won't do so for me placing it on hold. --K. Peake 10:06, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Happiness (Red Velvet song)
The article Happiness (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Happiness (Red Velvet song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:21, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Happiness (Red Velvet song)
The article Happiness (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Happiness (Red Velvet song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Future (Red Velvet song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Future (Red Velvet song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:02, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Future (Red Velvet song)
The article Future (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Future (Red Velvet song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 16:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Future (Red Velvet song)
The article Future (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Future (Red Velvet song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 12:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Contact
Hello, It has been nice frequently interacting with you on Wikipedia and I was thinking maybe we could message each other over online platforms, do you want to use email, FB or something else? --K. Peake 13:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
 * That would be actually nice. However, I'm keeping a low profile regarding my identity. But I do have an email where we can communicate and have contact a lot. :) And with that I may tell you anything regarding the things we'll talk about may it be personally or just for Wikipedia. Thank you for sending this message! It's really nice to meet you. :) [Email: bjh1991.rv@gmail.com] --LipaCityPH 13:43, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Red Velvet (group)
The article Red Velvet (group) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Red Velvet (group) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ???? -- ???? (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Infobox syntax
Hi, thanks for your contributions. However I noticed that in your contributions, in particular the infobox, you didn't make each parameters as newline but rather bunch them altogether. Please don't do that as it causes readability issues for other editors when they are editing in source mode. From my understand, you copied from your sandbox over to mainspace after you're done with your draft, however please make sure you reformat the infobox before publishing it.

While I know that, your sandbox consisting of multiple draft and at the same time, also multiple infobox which using the formatted infobox syntax will cause the 2nd and beyond infobox to not display/rendered, however in mainspace, each article would only have 1 infobox with exception like SMTOWN Live-type article where there would be multiple infoboxes. For articles, like SMTOWN Live, it is okay to have the syntax bunch together (as mentioned, is because of rendering issues), however for article where there will only be 1 infobox, it is not okay.

For your references, on what I'm actually talking about, below is two examples:

Your version

Correct and universal (Wikipedia sitewide) version

Once again, thanks you and please take note. Happy editing!  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  16:07, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Oh~ I was confused for a while when you told me about the messy infobox on the article! Thank you for pointing it out! :) I'm sorry for causing inconvenience. I'll take note of what you said to me! Thank you once again!! :) ReVeluv02 (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

K-pop industry terminology
Hi. Please avoid using K-pop industry terminology that isn't widely understood in a certain way outside of that industry. Most Western readers understand a title track to be a track that shares the name of the album or EP. The K-pop industry uses it interchangeably as a term for "lead single" even when, unlike the song "Like Water" from Like Water, it does not share the name of the album or EP it appears on. So please try to use the term lead single. Also, most Western readers do not add 'ballad' as a genre to infoboxes. I'm aware that ballad as a genre is a categorisation that is widespread in K-pop for bands or soloists whose main genre is pop doing a slow sentimental (love) song, but ballad is not widely considered a genre in the same way that pop or rock is, as ballads are a type of song that can be performed in several genres, so we should try listing that as its genre in the infobox. Thanks.  Ss  112   11:17, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the clarification! I'll take note of the things you said. :) Sorry for the inconvenience. ReVeluv02 (talk) 11:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

 * My very first barnstar! I have never thought of receiving this! Thank you so much! :) I'll do my best to improve articles related to Red Velvet and the members, also SM Entertainment artists as well!!! :) Thank you once again! ReVeluv02 (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Feel Good (Red Velvet – Irene & Seulgi song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Feel Good (Red Velvet – Irene & Seulgi song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Feel Good (Red Velvet – Irene & Seulgi song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ashley yoursmile!  15:43, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Diamond (Red Velvet – Irene & Seulgi song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diamond (Red Velvet – Irene & Seulgi song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Diamond (Red Velvet – Irene & Seulgi song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ashley yoursmile!  15:44, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wendy - Goodbye.png
Thanks for uploading File:Wendy - Goodbye.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Category:Joy (singer) has been nominated for deletion
Category:Joy (singer) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 05:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Wording and consistency
Hi, I'm currently just have time to go through couple of Joy single/songs article you have added. However, I seen that you're using the number rather than position when referring to the position in which the single charted on. For consistency (to chart table and to overall discography table), position would be the correct word to use rather than having an mixed term. Thanks you and happy editing.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  03:04, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi! I'm sorry about that. I was having a problem on that too. I was thinking of what word should I use. I'll be noting your comment regarding that. Sorry once again and thank you! :) ReVeluv02 (talk) 03:46, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello! Regarding that by the way, does that apply to every song articles with chart positions? I was checking out other articles from other artists (some even are good articles), use number instead of positions. However, I did follow your instructions anyway! :) Can you please enlighten me on when should I use the word "number" and "position" on the charting part of the article (most especially on the reception part of articles). Thank you once again! ^-^ ReVeluv02 (talk) 03:55, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, no need to apologize lol. In my opinion, using position would be better as both the chart table and the discography table is using peak position in the table heading. For consistency, using positions is the better choice. As for GA, I have no comment on that as GA are mostly reviewed by editors like you and me (yes, you can contribute by reviewing GA nomination, just don't review your own submitted GA will do) and I even saw new editor that aren't extended confirmed doing GA review and just passing it. Maybe, the GA reviewer isn't so concern about consistency but rather quality instead. Anyway, would suggest sticking to position as it is the wording used on both table (chart and discography).  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  04:06, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh okay! Thank you so much for the clarification! I will stick to your suggestion then! :) ReVeluv02 (talk) 04:08, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Future (Red Velvet song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Future (Red Velvet song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Future (Red Velvet song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ashley yoursmile!  14:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Two Words (Wendy song) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Two Words (Wendy song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Two Words (Wendy song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ashley yoursmile!  18:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Category:Wendy (singer) has been nominated for deletion
Category:Wendy (singer) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 21:34, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Hi ReVeluv02, it's great to see editors working to improve Korean-language music articles and I wanted to thank you for your tireless efforts. -- Ashley yoursmile!  05:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
 * My second barnstar! I have never thought of receiving this from you! Thank you so much! I will do my best always! :) ReVeluv02 (talk) 05:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automatic (Red Velvet song)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Automatic (Red Velvet song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wendy - Two Words.png
Thanks for uploading File:Wendy - Two Words.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 09:23, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automatic (Red Velvet song)
The article Automatic (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Automatic (Red Velvet song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 10:02, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Automatic (Red Velvet song)
The article Automatic (Red Velvet song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Automatic (Red Velvet song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:22, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Velvet - Future.ogg
Thanks for uploading File:Red Velvet - Future.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Velvet - Future.png
Thanks for uploading File:Red Velvet - Future.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Haruto Watanabe
Hello, ReVeluv02. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Haruto Watanabe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Red Velvet - Red Room.png
Thanks for uploading File:Red Velvet - Red Room.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Wikilinking
Hi ReVeluv02, would appreciate that next time when you wikilink, don't change the syntax (it is following the template example where the space are equalize to ensure better editing). Thanks you and happy editing!  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  08:50, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello Paper9oll! I'm sorry if I made a mistake. I'm not actually familiar with syntax and such regarding your concern. Can you please elaborate more. I'm just familiar at editing and making articles for now. Thank you anyway for telling me what mistake I made. I appreciate it a lot! ^_^ ReVeluv02 (talk) 09:10, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @ReVeluv02 I'm not sure how you actually wikilinked, but when you wikilinked it and published, your revision removed all the spacing.

Example (Prior) {{Track listing
 * headline    = Track listing for Queendom
 * extra_column = Arrangement


 * title1      = Queendom
 * lyrics1     = Jo Yoon-kyung
 * music1      = {{hlist|minGtion ({{lang|ko|밍지션}})|Anne Judith Stokke Wik|Moa "Cazzi Opeia" Carlebecker|Ellen Berg}}
 * extra1      = minGtion ({{lang|ko|밍지션}})
 * length1     = 3:01

...
 * title2      = Pose

Example (After your wikilinked revision) {{Track listing
 * headline = Track listing for Queendom
 * extra_column = Arrangement
 * title1 = Queendom
 * lyrics1 = Jo Yoon-kyung
 * music1 = {{hlist|minGtion ({{lang|ko|밍지션}})|Anne Judith Stokke Wik|Moa "Cazzi Opeia" Carlebecker|Ellen Berg}}
 * extra1 = minGtion ({{lang|ko|밍지션}})
 * length1 = 3:01
 * title2 = Pose

The example is not the full coding, I just copy the top part for example. As you can see, the prior version has consistency spacing where the = is all aligned and there are spacing between each track, while your wikilinked revision removed all the consistency spacing. I welcome your edit, however please prevent from going against the styling as defined with the example on Template:Track listing. Thanks a lot.  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  09:21, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, I get it now! I actually didn't know that happened. I wikilink such through "visual editing", not the typical "source editing". Maybe it has something to do with the type of editing the page I make. I'm sorry anyway and thank you for showing my mistake. :) ReVeluv02 (talk) 09:23, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @ReVeluv02 No problem. Happy editing!  — Paper9oll  (🔔 • 📝)  09:34, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Request
Could you start an article for Red Velvet's single Sappy? Thanks.TheHotwiki (talk) 09:39, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi TheHotwiki! Thank you for your request. :) I've been wanting as well to make an article regarding Red Velvet's Japanese second single "Sappy". However, there are too little citations I could get regarding its composition and reception. ONly if there were a lot of that reliable information, I could make an article regarding that! :( Same goes for #Cookie Jar. It seems that there is too little reliable information about the song. :( ReVeluv02 (talk) 09:55, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Okay. Anyway thanks for your contributions in Red Velvet's articles.TheHotwiki (talk) 09:58, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't worry, if I'll be able to find many references, I'll be making an article for sure! Thank you also for seeing my contributions to Red Velvet! I try to make genuine and factual articles regarding them! I'll take note of your request on the future. Thank you! :) ReVeluv02 (talk) 10:04, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

Hi TheHotwiki! I have actually made an article for Sappy. There is too little information and articles covering "Sappy" but I tried making a genuine article about it. ReVeluv02 (talk) 14:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah I just saw it a few minutes ago. Thank you for creating the article!TheHotwiki (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)