User talk:ReZonance3

/sandbox

Article review: Workplace relationships
Hey there; it's your friendly campus ambassador(s) doing the rounds on your group's work so far!

Overall this article is informative, but there are a few changes that could make this article better.

First you need to finish wikifying your references. Secondly, there are a few grammatical issues that need to be fixed.

Great work overall.

-dean (talk) 00:15, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Following up on what Dean said, you've ots of good information with this one; now you just need to focus on organizing it well and clarifying as much as possible. Let me break it down by section:

Introduction: Make sure the bolded part matches the title of the article, and try to fix some of those Random Acts of Capitalization (Workplace, Show, Average, etc). Also make sure that this paragraph is just about the article as a whole; it looks like you're focusing a bit on the friendships aspect. Just let your readers know what the topic is, why it's important, and give a (brief) overview of what you'll be covering.

Workplace friendships: The language gets a little technical here—I'm sure that's fine for your class, but people are going to be wondering how a concept like friendship can sound so academic. Just something to keep in mind! Make sure you also update your citations to wiki format using the "cite" bar up above the editing window (let me know if you need help).

Boss-subordinate relationships: I love the information in here, but it took me several tries to understand any of it. Try to explain boss-subordinate relationships at the beginning, then introduce topics like the Hawthorne Effect or people like Kohn & O'Connel before you delve into the technical details. Also, don't be afraid to use bulleted lists or subheadings to organize your information, such as with K&C's "6 major habits" (your wiki markup cheat sheet will show you how to do these). A little formatting can do wonders for readability!

Romantic workplace relationships: First off, you don't need to bold the title again, although you've definitely got the right idea introducing the section that way. In fact, the whole first paragraph is an excellent overview of the topic and its importance! Now what the section needs is more fleshing out: How does each type of relationship affect productivity and office atmosphere? Have there been any studies on the subject? How do companies like to deal with romantic relationships? ''[EDIT: I just remembered another group is doing that. Never mind! -Veret (talk) 02:12, 4 November 2011 (UTC)]''

Family workplace relationships: You've done a good job here of outlining advantages and disadvantages of family-owned businesses; do you think you could talk a little about nepotism in non-family businesses as well? The quote at the end also needs to be introduced somehow (e.g. "according to Donald Trump..."). Lastly, make sure to cite everything with the correct format as mentioned above.

References: That big "CITE ERROR: INVALID  TAG" just means the original Sias reference got deleted, but it's still mentioned somewhere else. Find where the citation goes, put it back in, and it should fix itself. Also, when you've finished updating all your references to the proper wiki format, be sure to delete the ones you put in this section manually. When you're done, the only thing under ==References== (in the code) should be the line itself. Good job on the sources, though! This whole article is very well-cited.

-Veret (talk) 00:43, 4 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Workplace relationships


The article Workplace relationships has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Essay not encyclopedic"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Amisom (talk) 19:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Fellow visitors, although creator of the article about workplace relationships, not edited since 2011. JarrahTree 23:57, 14 January 2018 (UTC)