User talk:Readyornotnot

July 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Grinder has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Grinder was changed by Readyornotnot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853921 on 2013-07-14T20:44:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

February 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=594409461 your edit] to Binghamton University may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:42, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Binghamton has one of the top student:faculty ratios of any university in the country at 20:1. http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/spp%2B50/
 * 129 undergraduate engineering; 181 Biological Science, 140 chemistry, 193 nursing among others. http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities/spp%2B50/

April 2014
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Binghamton University. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. ''
 * I moved the section to the talk page. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)''  16:46, 5 April 2014 (UTC)