User talk:RealEditor72

July 2018
Hello. Your recent edit to Chico, California appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 13:46, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Chico, California. John from Idegon (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Very simply, you cannot ever add content here stating someone is involved in making pornography without providing a citation to a reliable source that verifies that fact. If that were my daughter, we'd be discussing this fist to face. We take issues that could be potentially libelous very seriously, and it's a fair certainty that you will not be allowed to do it again without your editing privileges being sanctioned or revoked. Some amount of common sense is required to edit here. You need to show some. The entirety of the first message also still applies. John from Idegon (talk) 03:45, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Ad Orientem (talk) 04:23, 27 July 2018 (UTC)