User talk:RealShivaaa

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Digitics247


A tag has been placed on Draft:Digitics247, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. ~ Ase1este charge-paritytime 05:30, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Digitics247 again, and paid editing disclosure
The page Draft:Digitics247 has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia for a second time. As with the last time, this was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page was unambiguous advertising which only promoted the company, and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information. There is no chance any article on this company is suitable for Wikipedia at this time, even if you didn't write it in a blatantly promotional manner. Continuing to recreate this could result in a block from further editing, as Wikipedia is not a platform for advertisements, and yet it takes up time to deal with utterly unsuitable content like this.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:27, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * There is another issue, which is that because drafts are never posted except by insiders, you must comply with our mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements before making any other edits regarding this company. On the other hand, it's a waste of time because there is no chance of that succeeding. Nevertheless, I will advise the specifics anyway: The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g., by posting to your user page something like: .--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:36, 9 March 2021 (UTC)