User talk:Real Muslims

A summary of site guidelines and policies you need to learn

 * "Truth" is not the criteria for inclusion, verifiability is.
 * Wikipedia is not a general discussion forum, additions to talk pages should be about improving the article within the guidelines, not voicing one's opinion on the subject matter.
 * Always cite a source for any new information. When adding this information to articles, use, containing the name of the source, the author, page number, publisher or web address (if applicable).
 * We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology.
 * Reliable sources typically include: articles from magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards.  User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided.  Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
 * Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources.  Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for.  In the case of science, this evidence must ultimately start with physical evidence.  In the case of religion, this means only reporting what has been written and not taking any stance on doctrine.

Your last edit to Talk:Islam was removed for having nothing to do with improving the article. Even if it did, Wikipedia does not accept unsourced conspiracy theories. Ian.thomson (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Islam for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your user subpage at User:Real Muslims may not meet Wikipedia's user page guideline&#32;because Wikipedia is not a blog, it is an encyclopedia.. If you believe that your userpage does not violate our guidelines, please leave a note on this page. As an alternative, you may add  to the top of the page in question and an administrator will delete it, or you can simply edit the page so that it meets Wikipedia's userpage guidelines. Thank you. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Neither am i using it as a blog, its a discussion topic to see the opinions of others on whether it should be added to the main discussion page. Real Muslims (talk) 02:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Your post doesn't actually discuss any changes to the Islam article. It just makes accusations without evidence or sources. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:26, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Please check your own userpage User:Ian.thomson as it seems more like a blog. I will be adding more evidences and references to my discussion topic later. Real Muslims (talk) 02:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If you actually read our userpage policy, you would find out that we're allowed to add material to our userpages concerning our actions here. We're not allowed to use it for posts unrelated to the encyclopedia. Ian.thomson (talk) 02:40, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

I have no idea what you are talking about? of course its related to the encyclopedia its related to the attack on palestine.

I have to log off now, I will add more evidences and references to my discussion topic later. Real Muslims (talk) 02:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
 * If it's related to attacks on Palestine, then why did you add it to the Islam article? With the post being at Talk:Islam, there was no real connection to the article. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:03, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Real Muslims


A tag has been placed on User:Real Muslims requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CptViraj (📧) 11:43, 24 June 2019 (UTC)