User talk:Real doing

'This account is not a Sockpuppet'' but puts valid, highly relevant, and important scientific contributions in Wikipedia. If an editor of Wikipedia wants to delete, he/she can do so. But, then he/she will not be doing right thing. So, the best idea would be to restore all the contributions put in Wikipedia by this user. Wikipedia readers like more scientific articles with proper citations. I welcome any discussions with any Wikipedia editor.'''

Tsunami
I removed your addition to the article because I found that it contained both word for word text and some very close paraphrasing from the Pudasaini articles. We need to be careful with adding text that may be copyrighted. Thank you, Dawnseeker2000   01:59, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Don't worry, I am considering to re-editing this.

Nomination of Mobility number for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mobility number is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mobility number until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TR 12:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC) '''Please just go through the cited paper, and Fig. 9, then you will see the importance of Mobility number. So, I would strongly suggest not to delete this!'''


 * Importance does not equal notability. Please see the guidelines for including articles in Wikipedia. If you wish to object to the deletion please do so on the page: Articles for deletion/Mobility number TR 15:31, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Mass multi article Shiva P. Pudasaini and Kolumban Hutter WP:CITESPAM
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. --Hu12 (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

'''The contributions I have added are not promotional. This contains very important information. So, removing those contributions is not a good idea. It is worth reading this well known book covering broad aspects of avalanche phenomena before (if you really want) to delete the new contribution.''' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.153.51.218 (talk) 19:11, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Accounts

--Hu12 (talk) 21:40, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Buoyant flows
An article that you have been involved in editing, Buoyant flows, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. RockMagnetist (talk) 17:07, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Factorization of the mean for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Factorization of the mean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Factorization of the mean until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 22:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)