User talk:Realcitizen007

Nomination of Neo-sovereignism for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neo-sovereignism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Neo-sovereignism until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sports Devotee (talk) 07:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

-

Does not seem like a notable ideal and I can not see in WP:RS that indicate this article passes the WP:GNG Sports Devotee (talk) 07:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

"...significant coverage in reliable sources..." by itself is vague as a standard. When is a third-party source considered reliable enough? Does wrongful reporting on countless occasions by for instance mainstream press outlets, who are allegedly "reliable sources", indicate reliability? Realcitizen007 (talk) 08:00, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

What is notable? What is notable to someone is not by definition notable to another. Realcitizen007 (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2016 (UTC)