User talk:Realconspiracies

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryan Sparks
Hello Realconspiracies,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ryan Sparks for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mycomp86 (talk) 09:52, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

March 2016
Hello, I'm Melonkelon. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Elisabeth of the Palatinate has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Melonkelon (talk) 00:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Empirical evidence has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Empirical evidence was changed by Realconspiracies (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965122 on 2016-04-12T04:45:08+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at A priori and a posteriori. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:54, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: A priori and a posteriori was changed by Realconspiracies (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959283 on 2016-04-12T04:54:23+00:00.