User talk:Realhistorybuff

August 2011
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring&#32; after a review of the reverts you have made on India. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Quigley (talk) 16:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at India, you may be blocked from editing. Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  16:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Please stop copypasting content from sources and repeatedly adding the same content when multiple editors have asked you to discuss before adding anything. Please open a discussion at Talk:India and explain why the content should be included in the article. If you continue to revert you are likely to be blocked from editing. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
 * You have been reported for edit warring at WP:AN3. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:42, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to China, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Quigley (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Model minority. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Quigley (talk) 17:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at India. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. WikiPuppies! (bark) 17:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring by violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Kuru  (talk)  18:21, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on India. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. In particular, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. You are continuing your edit war immediately after your block despite every other editor (seven in total) asking you not to add this information to the article and explaining the rationale quite clearly. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  20:24, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

There is nothing wrong with my "Unveiled" source. My sentence regarding the inventions and discoveries of India is also true! I'll tell you what, mate, when I am giving you such overwhelming evidence to prove that India is all those things, why are you going out of your way to discredit me?? It is true. India was the source of many of the most important inventions and discoveries and India is a potential superpower. Go through the links that I have posted!!

Realhistorybuff (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Reported at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Elockid  ( Talk ) 20:40, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:India, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  20:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

WP:ANI
There is currently a thread at WP:ANI concerning your editing. The relevant section is titled "User:Realhistorybuff and India". Nev1 (talk) 21:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of seventy-two hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  21:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Blocked

 * I don't really care about your content dispute. I care about your edit warring, disruptive editing, and block evasion.  Your response sounds like you will continue the same behavior, only "persistently".  I'll leave it for another admin to evaluate, since I have declined the previous request.  Kuru   (talk)  18:23, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page during the block has been revoked due to abuse of the unblock template. If you wish to appeal the block further, contact the unblock mailing list at . Daniel Case (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

AN notification
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elockid  ( Talk ) 22:44, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Banned
With this edit, in enacting a consensus of the community reached at the Administrator's Noticeboard, which may be viewed at, I hereby inform you that you are banned from editing the English Wikipedia with any account or IP address. Appeals may be made to the community, or to the Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please use e-mail if you wish to pursue an appeal, as your access to this talk page was revoked. Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC)